ligo-ex ligo-ds
  Richardson Lab Experimental Log, Page 12 of 15  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Authordown Type Category Subject
  343   Tue Feb 27 09:06:29 2024 Cynthia UpdateInterferometer Simulationscavity scan with higher order input laser
I performed a few cavity scan with the inputing laser with a different mode (not pure 00). For each laser I included a graph for just plotting the order with highest power (for example 1st order laser input the first plot only scanned for 1st order in that cavity), and I have also included a graph scanning for order 1-10.
Attachment 1: ligoPre_2_27.pdf
ligoPre_2_27.pdf
  363   Mon Apr 22 15:06:33 2024 Cynthia UpdateInterferometer Simulationscavity scan update
[Cynthia,Pooyan] Completed some simulations injecting 0-10th order modes. Some graphs will be used for the poster after some further titles, axis, and range adjustments.
Attachment 1: LIGO_4_22.pdf
LIGO_4_22.pdf
  381   Mon Jun 24 14:28:51 2024 Cynthia UpdateInterferometer SimulationsSIS cavity with thermal effect
tried to run a cavity scan with thermal deformation and ring heater for ITM04 ETM08 (aLIGO mirrors). Not sure about the accuracy of the graph as there is some commands that still need to verified.
Attachment 1: ETM08thermal.png
ETM08thermal.png
  392   Mon Jul 1 15:19:42 2024 Cynthia UpdateInterferometer SimulationsO4 and O5 mirror cavity scans with thermal effect
Attachment 1: cavityScan_07_01.pdf
cavityScan_07_01.pdf
  408   Mon Jul 15 15:44:52 2024 Cynthia UpdateInterferometer Simulationsperformed cavity scans with thermal effects and ring heater
Attachment 1: cavity_scan_07_15.pdf
cavity_scan_07_15.pdf
  424   Mon Aug 12 17:09:04 2024 Cynthia UpdateInterferometer SimulationsO4 vs O5 cavity scans with ITM plume guess or ETM
So far the proposed solution for what to use for O5 ITM mirror for SIS simulations is either the plume guess file or using the O5 ETM mirror for ITM. I had ran a cavity scan for both of these possibilities and it seems like the results produced are fairly different. The next step is most likely moving on to adding the Frosti effects including both of the proposed possibilities, and before this, a few confirmations and verifications are needed using similar previous studies to make sure my code produce the right result.
Attachment 1: O5_plots_and_tables.pdf
O5_plots_and_tables.pdf
Attachment 2: O4_plots_and_tables.pdf
O4_plots_and_tables.pdf
Attachment 3: ETM12mapO5.png
ETM12mapO5.png
Attachment 4: Screenshot_2024-08-12_at_5.05.31_PM.png
Screenshot_2024-08-12_at_5.05.31_PM.png
  428   Mon Aug 26 14:42:04 2024 Cynthia UpdateInterferometer Simulationscurrent status on cavity scan with effects of FROSTI
I used the code and arm cavity model used for previous O5 study on mirrors and HOM (the pdf of the study and the result can be found at https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-G2100878), but it seems like the result I obtained is different from the study result. Since my cavity scans codes have a large portion of it relying on this code, I will have to go over the study result and the code to make sure there is no issue with that code itself first. There are also some other updates or issued encountered when I tried to plot the mirror maps with effects of FROSTI.
Attachment 1: LIGO_updates_8_26.pdf
LIGO_updates_8_26.pdf
  443   Mon Sep 16 15:18:59 2024 Cynthia UpdateInterferometer Simulationsa breakdown of FROSTI and thermal effects and the resulting cavity scan
Attachment 1: ligo_update_9_16_(1).pdf
ligo_update_9_16_(1).pdf
  446   Mon Sep 23 15:00:41 2024 Cynthia UpdateInterferometer Simulationscorrections on assumption for O5 coating
The document recording ETM07 and ETM08 coating (T2300093) was discussed: the current plume files are not necessarily correct in a way that LIGO lab have tried to add it on uncoated ETM such as ETM07 and it does not match what the coated ETM07 would look like. the plume should be added on top of the uncoated ETM instead of assuming an ideal ETM. According to Garilynn, the imperfection on uncoated ETM matters. So far the possible ETM data used for O5, ETM 11,14,19, and 20 are all uncoated, and different ways could be used to predict the plume, including the plume data on LIGO dcc or subtract the uncoated data from the coated for O4 ETM and use that as another guessed plume.
Attachment 1: Uncoated_S1_ETM07-v2.pdf
Uncoated_S1_ETM07-v2.pdf
  587   Tue Jun 3 12:16:13 2025 Cynthia UpdateInterferometer SimulationsPoint absorber simulation on radially averaged profile
Attachment 1: update_6_3.pdf
update_6_3.pdf
  679   Thu Feb 5 13:34:13 2026 Cynthia UpdateInterferometer SimulationsPoint absorber + miscentering simulation
Attachment 1: update2_5_(3).pdf
update2_5_(3).pdf
  361   Mon Apr 15 15:25:10 2024 CynthiaUpdateInterferometer Simulationsprogress on simulation so far
Attachment 1: LIGO_update_week3_(2).pdf
LIGO_update_week3_(2).pdf
  374   Mon Jun 3 14:59:44 2024 CynthiaUpdateInterferometer SimulationsCreated cavity scan with LG modes
Attachment 1: ligo_update_6_3.pdf
ligo_update_6_3.pdf
  426   Mon Aug 19 07:11:55 2024 CynthiaUpdateInterferometer Simulationscavity scans with FROSTI effects
Attachment 1: LIGO_update_8_19.pdf
LIGO_update_8_19.pdf
  454   Wed Oct 2 13:38:00 2024 CynthiaUpdateInterferometer Simulationscavity scan with averaged O4 ETM coating as plume
Attachment 1: O5plumevsCoating.png
O5plumevsCoating.png
Attachment 2: O5CoatAvgpt5.png
O5CoatAvgpt5.png
Attachment 3: O5AVgcoatingFROSTIpt5.PNG
O5AVgcoatingFROSTIpt5.PNG
  526   Tue Feb 25 10:56:25 2025 CynthiaUpdateInterferometer Simulationsmirror coating added for simulation rerun
I have tried to rerun the simulation on finesse after adding the mirror coating. The result has a large fluctuation in required input power vs arm power that is concerning. I am currently working on potentially resolve this issue and get a reasonable graph before I proceed to optimizing the thermal maps.
Attachment 1: updats_(3).pdf
updats_(3).pdf
  530   Tue Mar 4 10:18:43 2025 CynthiaUpdateInterferometer Simulationsattempted to remove curvature and tilt for the coating
Attachment 1: 3_4_updates.pdf
3_4_updates.pdf
  540   Tue Mar 11 11:28:52 2025 CynthiaUpdateInterferometer Simulationsflattening mirror to study power discrepency
Attachment 1: updates_3_11_(1).pdf
updates_3_11_(1).pdf
  554   Tue Apr 15 11:37:17 2025 CynthiaUpdateInterferometer SimulationsFinishing up mirror coating map step
Attachment 1: updates_4_15_2025.pdf
updates_4_15_2025.pdf
  686   Thu Feb 19 12:34:18 2026 CynthiaUpdateInterferometer SimulationsPoint absorber simulation
Attachment 1: update_2_18.pdf
update_2_18.pdf
  692   Thu Mar 12 12:48:58 2026 CynthiaUpdateInterferometer SimulationsNew Result of point absorber+miscentering
Attachment 1: Untitled_presentation_(1).pdf
Untitled_presentation_(1).pdf
  697   Thu Apr 9 12:50:28 2026 CynthiaUpdateInterferometer SimulationsO5 Test mass
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1vJPZ9H_umgsZacCLgsqAUZWjn7-6l77np3E_YgaSy_M/edit?usp=sharing
  698   Thu Apr 16 12:53:30 2026 CynthiaUpdateInterferometer SimulationsO5 Test mass
Attachment 1: 4_16_update.pdf
4_16_update.pdf
  703   Thu Apr 23 12:47:05 2026 CynthiaUpdateInterferometer SimulationsO5 Test mass
Attachment 1: 4_23_26.pdf
4_23_26.pdf
  707   Thu Apr 30 13:23:55 2026 CynthiaUpdateInterferometer SimulationsO5 Test mass
frequency locations of 5-8th order mode across arm power of 0-800kW
Attachment 1: scan_5-8.png
scan_5-8.png
  711   Thu May 7 13:35:14 2026 CynthiaUpdateInterferometer SimulationsO5 Test mass
Attachment 1: Screenshot_2026-05-07_133453.png
Screenshot_2026-05-07_133453.png
  712   Thu May 14 12:37:17 2026 CynthiaUpdateMeasuring Noise in InterferometerO5 Test mass design
Attachment 1: update_5_13.pdf
update_5_13.pdf
  713   Thu May 14 13:42:57 2026 CynthiaUpdateInterferometer Simulationsless-roll-off coating
Attachment 1: e6caa8cf-2a96-49d8-a8b7-b84feab55404.png
e6caa8cf-2a96-49d8-a8b7-b84feab55404.png
  714   Thu May 28 12:54:38 2026 CynthiaUpdateInterferometer SimulationsO5 Test mass
Attachment 1: 5_28_update_(1).pdf
5_28_update_(1).pdf
  716   Thu Jun 4 13:30:46 2026 CynthiaUpdateInterferometer SimulationsO5 Test mass Presentation
Attachment 1: Nonspherical_polishing_profile_design_recommendation.pdf
Nonspherical_polishing_profile_design_recommendation.pdf
  723   Thu Jun 25 13:45:11 2026 CynthiaUpdateInterferometer SimulationsPoster Draft
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1tpYjs-gOfZgFFkffU0kv7rYKHu0xtfPyMZqF1qXHIOQ/edit?usp=sharing
  738   Thu Jul 16 13:14:26 2026 CynthiaUpdateInterferometer SimulationsLIGO pre-figuring team meeting summary
Pre-figuring meeting 7/14:

- the non-uniformity brought by annealing for ETM14 and 11 seems to be higher than expected, this meeting focused on discussing about annealing data for ETM014 and 11 : https://dcc-lho.ligo.org/LIGO-T2600213

    -we will receive more data for these, since there are some residual power left in the data/plots shown in the meeting because of the reference sphere, and the exact reference sphere radius is unclear

- reviewed the uniformity plot for HR ETM with TiGe coating again: https://dcc-lho.ligo.org/LIGO-T2600277

- not a lot of updates for ring heater: 40W delivered. Currently lock with 1.5W per segment on ETMy at LHO

- slides for HOM study for 250mW biased profile:

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1BWh_skxkCXBu_e_QkXkUs9CdvFIryu7H_jfpCgOenNg/edit?usp=sharing
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/174XVLLpNpNgnL0uV-dSp6MO5pmZ9Yvnouf8V0LA2zE8/edit?usp=sharing

However, we did not focus on any surface profile related topics in the meeting so it was not presented

  742   Wed Jul 29 23:56:29 2026 CynthiaUpdateInterferometer SimulationsPre-figuring meeting 7/28 summery
Pre-figuring meeting 7/14:

- using the change in surface from annealing, Hiro did some study on HOM scattering/losses from just this surface (shown in the email attachmnent O5testmass.pdf. We together went over these results again.

    - ETM11 annealing data to be used: https://dcc.ligo.org/T2600214
- more annealing data: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1E138nNZk5b1yPm0g5jmwv_Z9FD9ArQtnlAk1d_1Ce1U/edit?usp=sharing

- Mostly discussed what to do about this annealing surface change when we are polishing the mirror: The idea now is to polish around it (the polish will include the negative of those surface deformation), but it's better to express it in an analytical form to the manufactuer. We try to explore if it is feasible to represent this surface introduced by annealing as Zernike coefficients

- New ITM meausrement shown as attachment below

- Kevin and Evan will take this surface after annealing as part of their error analysis for their 250mW biased surface profile in the furture, meanwhile I tried to see how will the HOM and PRG conditions change if we don't do anything about this surface, using same analysis we did before:

-
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1nkyOmivyaPKkvbgf3TPBjgV2YcgRum7N1EvapgcIMaA/edit?slide=id.p#slide=id.p
Attachment 1: IMG_6504.jpg
IMG_6504.jpg
  635   Tue Aug 26 12:45:41 2025 Christina, Ma, TylerUpdateCDSRIN Update
Slides
  600   Fri Jun 27 15:38:22 2025 ChristinaUpdateTCSFROSTI Reconstruction

[Tyler, Ma, Christina, Luke]

We threaded the wiring of the heater elements through the reflective surfaces and were able to attach each piece with the Macor spacers and connect both sides. We used the guide rails and screws to ensure proper alignment. The only necessary step left is to add the additional external screws for the reconstruction.

Attachment 1: IMG_4009.png
IMG_4009.png
  601   Tue Jul 1 11:04:00 2025 ChristinaUpdateTCSFROSTI Reconstruction II

[Ma, Tyler, Christina]

Finished external reconstruction of the FROSTI by installing all the pins to the 2 DB 25 connectors. To ensure everything was operating correctly, we did electrical testing by testing continuity and by checking each of the heater elements' RTD and power resistance values and comparing them to what was tabulated in January. Additionally, we organized the wires and added the stands.

Attachment 1: IMG_4042.png
IMG_4042.png
  604   Mon Jul 7 16:39:18 2025 ChristinaUpdateTCSPomona Box Drawings

Below are the drawings for the pomona box modifications

Attachment 1: pbdwg1.PDF
pbdwg1.PDF
Attachment 2: pbdwg2.pdf
pbdwg2.pdf
  608   Thu Jul 10 16:41:18 2025 ChristinaUpdateTCS 

[Christina, Ma, Tyler]

Pomona Box completed and is now on the server rack in 1119. Additionally, the photodetectors were connected to the box and set up in front of the heater elements.

Attachment 1: 2994921113032912040.JPG
2994921113032912040.JPG
Attachment 2: 4717009101108174053.JPG
4717009101108174053.JPG
Attachment 3: 5782646701589802125.JPG
5782646701589802125.JPG
  611   Tue Jul 15 10:40:23 2025 ChristinaUpdateTCS 

[Christina, Ma, Tyler]

Yesterday, Ma and I started taking data for the PSD/CSD measurements while the photodetectors and one of the heater elements are on (8) and are using the Red Pitaya to compare it to the data we took for the same measurements on the CyMAC. It will be finished Wednesday morning, and then we plan on starting to take additional recordings in order to conduct the same type of comparison for the dark noise measurements.

Attachment 1: rpon.png
rpon.png
  614   Tue Jul 15 13:13:48 2025 ChristinaUpdateTCSPhotodetector optical post assembly
Attachment 1: pdreassembly.png
pdreassembly.png
  615   Tue Jul 22 12:20:29 2025 ChristinaUpdateTCS 

[Ma, Christina, Tyler]

Figure 1 shows the following PSDs for channels 0-15 from the 14 hour test. Figure 2 shows the reduced chi squared and CSD plots for both the 2 Hz and 16 Hz resolutions.

Attachment 1: PSDch0-15.png
PSDch0-15.png
Attachment 2: CSD2hz_16hz.png
CSD2hz_16hz.png
  619   Tue Jul 29 12:30:00 2025 ChristinaUpdateTCS260 hour ADC update

[Ma, Christina, Tyler]

ADC CyMAC 260 hr, 8192Hz sampling rate channels V3 and Vref6

Attachment 1: CSD_06_28_25_270hr.png
CSD_06_28_25_270hr.png
  624   Mon Aug 11 22:19:50 2025 ChristinaUpdateTCSRed Pitaya Data Streaming

[Ma, Tyler, Christina]

This past week, we were able to set up the data streaming for continuous acquisition to the PCs, and can conduct the initial tests now. We were able to do this by:

  • Installing the correct OS ecosystems to each Red Pitaya
  • Installing the terminal streaming client
  • Debugging formatting and file saving issues by saving the data in a TDMS file on the host PC.
We have started streaming the ADC data on Monday from both boards for 2 days, which are currently in the clean room. Below are the ADC tests we performed before starting the 2-day run. (Time in ms)

Attachment 1: 3.png
3.png
Attachment 2: 3-1.png
3-1.png
  629   Tue Aug 12 13:46:56 2025 ChristinaUpdate  
Attachment 1: 3.png
3.png
Attachment 2: 3-1.png
3-1.png
  631   Tue Aug 19 12:08:40 2025 ChristinaUpdateTCSRP Initial vs CyMAC Plot Comparisons
[Tyler, Ma, Christina]

These are the frequency averaged and veto binned plots for the initial Red Pitaya and CyMAC systems.

Attachment 1: 11hzCSD.png
11hzCSD.png
Attachment 2: 11hzstrain.png
11hzstrain.png
  173   Thu Jul 27 10:18:43 2023 CelesteUpdateTCSGraphical Updates to HOM RH Modification
Attached are updated graphs of the irradiance distribution from the 1/8th ring heater units (extruded and reduced in length).
Attachment 1: HOM_RH_1_8_Unit_Modification_Graphs.pdf
HOM_RH_1_8_Unit_Modification_Graphs.pdf
  180   Fri Jul 28 17:45:45 2023 CelesteUpdateTCSGraphical Updates to HOM RH Modification, Friday 7/28
Updated 1/8th Heater simulation modification graphs. Slides 7, 10, 16-19 are new additions.
Attachment 1: HOM_RH_Simulation_Progress.pdf
HOM_RH_Simulation_Progress.pdf
  187   Tue Aug 1 16:22:35 2023 CelesteUpdateTCSGraphical Updates to HOM RH Modification, Tuesday 8/1
Slides 20-33 are newly added (data/graphs from parameter sweep feature-1/8th heater unit length varied from 10% of original to 100% of original).
Attachment 1: HOM_RH_Simulation_Progress_80123.pdf
HOM_RH_Simulation_Progress_80123.pdf
  200   Thu Aug 10 14:13:38 2023 CelesteUpdateTCS8/10/23, Simulation Graphical Progress
Attachment 1: Simulation_Progress__8_10_23.pdf
Simulation_Progress__8_10_23.pdf
  204   Fri Aug 11 10:57:20 2023 CelesteUpdateTCS8/11/23 Simulation Progress
Attachment 1: Simulation_Progress__1_32nd_Model_(1).pdf
Simulation_Progress__1_32nd_Model_(1).pdf
ELOG V3.1.3-7933898