ID |
Date |
Author |
Type |
Category |
Subject |
12
|
Mon Nov 28 18:10:23 2022 |
shane | Update | ELOG | Particle counts in the clean room |
Particle count stats for the clean room Nov 28, 2022:
Took 10 sample runs in each of 5 regions in the clean room (5 runs per region with a person inside the clean room for the measurement, and 5 runs per region without anyone in the clean room for the measurement), for a total of 50 samples taken. Sample time was 60 seconds. Overall clean room average particle count for the size ranges are as follows:
0.3 micrometers- 3405.76 (room occupied), 974.92 (room empty)
0.5 micrometers- 409.72 (room occupied), 409.72 (room empty)
1.0 micrometers- 1102.2 (room occupied), 282.6 (room empty)
2.5 micrometers- 692.32 (room occupied), 183.68 (room empty)
4.0 micrometers- 254.28 (room occupied), 84.72 (room empty)
5.0 micrometers- 141.24 (room occupied), 84.72 (room empty)
7.0 micrometers- 56.48 (room occupied), 84.72 (room empty)
10.0 micrometers- 42.36 (room occupied, 42.36 (room empty)
More statistics (including individual stats on the 5 regions within the clean room) attached. |
Attachment 1: clean_room_particle_counts_11_28_-_Sheet1.pdf
|
|
19
|
Fri Feb 3 13:04:04 2023 |
shane | Summary | General | clean room particle counts 1/25/23 |
Clean room count graphs for each zone (as of January 25, 2023) attached |
Attachment 1: cleanroomcountsJan25.pdf
|
|
71
|
Wed Apr 12 16:17:50 2023 |
shane | Update | General | Particle Counter moved |
With the added height of the new docking station, the particle counter no longer fits under the Windows monitor in the electronics rack and has been moved to the desk in the corner of the lab. |
Attachment 1: IMG_6693.HEIC
|
178
|
Fri Jul 28 13:39:39 2023 |
shane | Update | Cleanroom | full 5 zone cleanroom particle count |
Here's the 5 zone cleanroom measurement from today. |
Attachment 1: download.png
|
|
193
|
Mon Aug 7 13:58:46 2023 |
shane | Update | CDS | internal power supply cables done for AI chassis |
Finished assembling and installing the aLigo chassis internal power supply cables in the anti-imaging chassis today. Tested for continuity and everything looked good. Chassis lid still secured with two temporary screws because I'm not sure what the correct size is. |
Attachment 1: IMG_8674.jpeg
|
|
260
|
Thu Nov 9 19:06:46 2023 |
shane | Update | Cleanroom | 5 zone cleanroom measurement |
Here's today's five zone measurement, taken ~5 hours after the cleaning. Zone 5 (closest to fire cabinet and back wall) is a bit over the limit in all size ranges (about 1500 particles in 1.0u size range over), and zone 2 is slightly over the limit in the 1.0u range, but everything else is under the requirement. |
Attachment 1: 23.jpeg
|
|
262
|
Fri Nov 10 14:16:04 2023 |
shane | Update | Cleanroom | new cleanroom zone diagram |
since the vac system has been moved and made permanent, here's a new diagram of the cleanroom zones. The zones themselves haven't moved, but the diagram has been updated to reflect the new set up of the cleanroom. |
Attachment 1: cleanroom_zones_nov2023.jpg
|
|
309
|
Thu Jan 18 18:06:49 2024 |
shane | Update | Cleanroom | cleanroom 5 zone particle count measurement |
Here's today's full five zone measurement of the cleanroom |
Attachment 1: 24.png
|
|
315
|
Fri Feb 2 19:18:24 2024 |
shane | Update | Cleanroom | cleanroom cleaning and particle count |
[Aiden, Shane, Luis, Luke]
cleaning cleanroom and particle count
|
318
|
Wed Feb 7 12:43:22 2024 |
shane | Update | Cleanroom | cleanroom particle counts (full 5 zone measurement) |
Here's today's full 5 zone measurement of the cleanroom. Everything is back under the requirement. |
Attachment 1: 24.png
|
|
365
|
Tue May 7 20:34:31 2024 |
shane | Update | CDS | frosti MEDM screen update |
[Luis, Shane]
Here is the updated MEDM screen, with new orientation and updated labeling to reflect the actual positions of the heater elements. Note that indices start at T0 to be consistent with simulink model, though in the previous elog for the FROSTI layout the heater elements are labeled 1-8.
Also, we finally learned how to take a screenshot on debian. |
Attachment 1: FROSTIMEDMMay7.2024.png
|
|
505
|
Tue Jan 28 13:30:46 2025 |
shane | Update | CDS | Serial comms testing update |
Attempted to communicate with the smaller vac pump (TwissTor 74) via Agilent software today. Was able to communicate with the pump via python serial connection code as usual, with no issues. When using the manufacturer software though, it was unable to 'locate' the pump and failed to connect to it. So manufacturer software works for the big (older) pump, but not the smaller, newer one. Unclear if this is somehow related to the fact that using the manufacturer software for the bigger pump involved manually connecting its controller to spica with a db9, and there was no obvious way to do that for the smaller pump's controller. |
451
|
Wed Oct 2 10:31:46 2024 |
Xuesi Ma | Configuration | | Group Meeting Slides 10/2/2024 |
Group Meeting slides for Non-deterministic Heater Response.
|
Attachment 1: Group_Meeting_10_2.pdf
|
|
458
|
Tue Oct 15 15:27:38 2024 |
Xuesi Ma | Update | ELOG | Timing Chassis Update |
I conducted separate tests on the '5015' and '3010a'. When powered individually, the '5015' outputs a signal at 33.55 MHz with an amplitude of 608 mV. It draws 1 A of current from the power source. The input signal for the '3010a' is 33.54 MHz with an amplitude of 670 mV (peak-to-peak) and a 15 mV DC offset. The output signal from channel 1 is a 65.5 kHz square wave with an amplitude of 3.28 V. The '3010a' draws 0.1 A of current.
Both the '5015' and '3010a' work fine when powered separately. However, when both are powered together, the power source behaves as if there is a short circuit. The current theory is that the switch or breaker is tripping, as it has a 1 A current rating. Since the combined current demand of both devices exceeds 1 A, this may be causing the issue.
Slides for 10/16/2024 Group Meeting |
Attachment 1: 20241015_134152.mp4
|
Attachment 2: 20241015_133118.png
|
|
Attachment 3: 20241015_133124.png
|
|
Attachment 4: 20241015_133136.png
|
|
Attachment 5: 20241015_133207.png
|
|
Attachment 6: 20241015_133543.png
|
|
Attachment 7: 20241015_133550.png
|
|
Attachment 8: 20241015_133555.png
|
|
Attachment 9: 20241015_133300.png
|
|
Attachment 10: 20241015_133643.png
|
|
Attachment 11: 20241015_134202.png
|
|
Attachment 12: 20241015_135353.png
|
|
503
|
Mon Jan 27 11:29:38 2025 |
Xuesi Ma | Update | | Heater Element Test |
[Ma, Cece, Luke, Mary, Shane]
On Friday (Jan 24), we installed the heater elements on the stand. The heater elements are arranged from 1 to 8, oriented from right to left as shown in Attachment 1. Each wire has been labeled according to its corresponding element number and type (e.g., RTD connections, heater connections).
Note: We currently do not have enough PEEK zip ties, so standard zip ties have been used temporarily. These must be replaced with PEEK zip ties before the setup is placed in the vacuum chamber. |
Attachment 1: 20250124_165434.png
|
|
Attachment 2: 20250124_165342.png
|
|
504
|
Mon Jan 27 23:35:28 2025 |
Xuesi Ma | Update | | |
[Ma]
Installed all the pins to the peek DB 25 connectors |
Attachment 1: 20250127_142647.jpg
|
|
Attachment 2: 20250127_153454.jpg
|
|
Attachment 3: 20250127_154516.jpg
|
|
506
|
Fri Jan 31 15:03:09 2025 |
Xuesi Ma | Update | | Heater Element Circuit Check |
[Ma] Wed 1/29/2025
No short circuit between heater element ✓
No short circuit to ground on any pin ✓
No short circuit between connectors ✓
Heater Number |
Power Resistor before (Ohm) |
Power Resistor now (Ohm) |
RTD Resistor before (Ohm) |
RTD Resistor now (Ohm) |
1 |
73.6 |
73.1 |
81.8 |
81.3 |
2 |
70.4 |
69.6 |
82.1 |
81.6 |
3 |
71 |
70.5 |
84.5 |
84 |
4 |
71.5 |
71 |
80 |
79.4 |
5 |
70.5 |
70.2 |
81.7 |
81.2 |
6 |
72 |
71.6 |
79.4 |
78.7 |
7 |
69.2 |
69 |
78.2 |
77.5 |
8 |
71.1 |
70.6 |
84.2 |
83.6 |
|
508
|
Mon Feb 3 13:17:21 2025 |
Xuesi Ma | Update | | |
[Ma]
changed all zip ties to peek zip ties, and grouped wires together. The setup is ready to go into the chamber. |
Attachment 1: 20250203_123153.jpg
|
|
Attachment 2: 20250203_123213.jpg
|
|
514
|
Tue Feb 18 10:01:07 2025 |
Xuesi Ma | Update | | |
[Ma, Pooyan, Tyler]
On Friday, we connected the vacuum chamber with the Cymac. |
Attachment 1: IMG_7916.jpeg
|
|
Attachment 2: IMG_7915.jpeg
|
|
Attachment 3: IMG_7917.jpeg
|
|
515
|
Tue Feb 18 10:02:16 2025 |
Xuesi Ma | Update | | Group Meeting Slides 2/18/2025 |
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1WiV2VqS0BzXNCK6VYYQ-Ty8xlHnzXatQaFbMf1-0rsY/edit?usp=sharing |
525
|
Tue Feb 25 10:02:32 2025 |
Xuesi Ma | Update | | |
1424039912.625576 2025/02/19 22:38:14 UTC Time start
24V 2.8A right after start all 8 elements
1424044804.902443 2025/02/19 23:59:46 UTC Time stop
24V 1.8A right before stop all 8 elements
0.1A right before start and right after stop
note: turned on briefly to check current right before stop
2/20 RGA Scan
spikes??
1424129207.857777 2025/02/20 23:26:29 UTC Time start
24V 2.9A right after start all 8 elements
1424140789.856096 2025/02/21 02:39:31 UTC Time stop
24V 1.7A right before stop all 8 elements
0.1A right before start and right after stop
2025/02/21 02:43:19 UTC
Main chamber pressure: 1.54e-8
RGA chamber pressure:5.06e-9
spikes are due to loose connection between connectors.
1424210410.173863 2025/02/21 21:59:52 UTC Time start
24V 2.9A right after start all 8 elements
1424218357.96404 2025/02/22 00:12:19 UTC Time stop
24V 1.7A right before stop all 8 elements
each elements: 0.3A (0.2A increment)(all)
0.1A right before start and right before stop
2/24 RGA Scan
1424467918.129082 2025/02/24 21:31:40 UTC Time start
12V 2A right after start all 8 elements
1424478936.635821 2025/02/25 00:35:18 UTC Time stop
12V 1.6A right before stop all 8 elements
each elements: 0.4A (0.2A increment)(all)
0.2A right before start
rise time: A(1-exp(-t/tau))+B
fall time: Aexp(-t/tau) +B |
Attachment 1: resistance_vs_time_all_channels_all_time.pdf
|
|
Attachment 2: temperature_vs_time_all_channels_all_time.pdf
|
|
Attachment 3: resistance_vs_time_rise_time.pdf
|
|
Attachment 4: resistance_vs_time_fall_time.pdf
|
|
528
|
Tue Mar 4 03:05:42 2025 |
Xuesi Ma | Update | ELOG | LOG |
1424564097.243212 2025/02/26 00:14:39 UTC Time start
12V 2A right after start all 8 elements
1424564478.079428 2025/02/26 00:21:00 UTC Time stop
12V 1.8A right before stop all 8 elements
1424564832.211584 2025/02/26 00:26:54 UTC Time start
12V 1.9A right after start all 8 elements
1424565208.359935 2025/02/26 00:33:10 UTC Time stop
12V 1.8A right before stop all 8 elements
1424565573.565066 2025/02/26 00:39:15 UTC Time start
12V 1.8A right after start all 8 elements
1424565931.242394 2025/02/26 00:45:13 UTC Time stop
12V 1.7A right before stop all 8 elements
1424566292.67104 2025/02/26 00:51:14 UTC Time start
12V 1.8A right after start all 8 elements
1424566648.619952 2025/02/26 00:57:10 UTC Time stop
12V 1.7A right before stop all 8 elements
1424566996.312246 2025/02/26 01:02:58 UTC Time start
12V 1.8A right after start all 8 elements
1424567381.748943 2025/02/26 01:09:23 UTC Time stop
12V 1.7A right before stop all 8 elements
1424567756.528736 2025/02/26 01:15:38 UTC Time start
12V 1.7A right after start all 8 elements
0.2A right before start
spikes!?
1424643001.864687 2025/02/26 22:09:43 UTC
change c_0(VEXC0 & VCXC0) to 2V (why is it on 5V ?)
2025/02/26 22:18:51 UTC
Main chamber pressure:5.92e-9
RGA chamber pressure:1.98e-9
1424650528.240947 2025/02/27 00:15:10 UTC Time start (increase voltage)
24V 2.1A right after start all 8 elements
disconnect and reconnect (exc 1-4)(out 9-12) & (exc 5-8)(out 13-16)
2025/02/27 19:34:26 UTC
Main chamber pressure:1.34e-8
RGA chamber pressure:4.33e-9
Main chamber temp: 29
RGA chamber temp:29
2025/02/28 18:02:29 UTC
Main chamber pressure:1.05e-8
RGA chamber pressure:3.53e-9
Main chamber temp: 29
RGA chamber temp:30
1424801097.374902 2025/02/28 18:04:39 UTC Time stop
24V 1.8A right before stop all 8 elements
0.1A right after stop
1424827460.71372 2025/03/01 01:24:02 UTC Time start
24V 2.9A right after start all 8 elements
0.1A right before start
2025/03/01 01:25:34 UTC
Main chamber pressure:5.98e-9
RGA chamber pressure:2.06e-9
Main chamber temp:27
RGA chamber temp:27
2025/03/03 20:28:03 UTC
Main chamber pressure:7.8e-9
RGA chamber pressure:2.64e-9
Main chamber temp:27
RGA chamber temp:27 |
529
|
Tue Mar 4 03:33:18 2025 |
Xuesi Ma | Update | | Update |
Spikes Appear Again, need to address it systematically.
Power on and off before reaching steady state ✔
At 12V, the rise and fall time of heater elements are different from 24V.
Initial guess is due to temperature in the chamber. However, it does not seem to be the case, 24V with 30c have the same hall time as 24V at lower temperature.
Attached are some graphs for rise and fall time
After a weekend of powering on, the main chamber pressure stabilized in the UHV region.
Temperature in the chamber seems also not to change. |
Attachment 1: resistance_vs_time_all_channels_all_time.pdf
|
|
Attachment 2: resistance_vs_time_rise_time.pdf
|
|
Attachment 3: resistance_vs_time_fall_time.pdf
|
|
Attachment 4: resistance_vs_time_rise_time_12V.pdf
|
|
Attachment 5: resistance_vs_time_fall_time_12V.pdf
|
|
Attachment 6: resistance_vs_time_fall_time_24V_30c.pdf
|
|
539
|
Tue Mar 11 10:43:57 2025 |
Xuesi Ma | Update | | |
Continue investigation in the spikes
Pulsed ADC with a function generator and find no spikes. Rules out ADC for causing the spikes
Loopback test that bypasses the FROSTI Chassis shows spikes (spikes happened on all channels at the same time)
Next step is to bypass the AI Chassis to find the source of the spikes |
Attachment 1: 20250310_171936.jpg
|
|
544
|
Mon Mar 31 15:41:56 2025 |
Xuesi Ma | Update | | |
The result from AI Chassis bypass test showed that the AI Chassis may be the problem. There are no spikes from DAC's direct output.
All chassis except timing chassis are turned off. Power supplies for 24V, 18V, and -18V are turned off
The AI chassis has been taken out of the rack for further inspection
Refer to:
https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-E2300117
https://dcc.ligo.org/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?.submit=Identifier&docid=D2300124&version= |
389
|
Fri Jun 28 10:43:13 2024 |
Xuejun | Update | Cleanroom | Frosti |
[Xuejun, Tyler]
We moved Frosti into the cleanroom and debugged it to make sure everything was working. One of the DB25 pins broke off at the connector for element 1 so it needed to be recrimped. Element 6 short circuited but fixed with adjustment to the heater power pin position. We connected the power and sensor connectors to the power box and recalibrated the RTD sensors.
|
Attachment 1: frosti.jpg
|
|
Attachment 2: chassis.jpg
|
|
396
|
Mon Jul 8 10:39:14 2024 |
Xuejun | Update | FLIR | Average Temperature Profile |
After taking data for each of the individual heater elements, I imported them into python and overlayed them to produce an average temperature profile. I rotated the 7 of the elements to align with element 1's profile and averaged them out. By setting the range to 28C - 33C (this gave the best visibility of the heating pattern) it gave the profile attached. |
Attachment 1: Average-Temperature-Profile.pdf
|
|
421
|
Tue Aug 6 13:07:07 2024 |
Xuejun | Update | Interferometer Simulations | |
[Xuejun]
The width and location of the measured in-air change in temperature profile has been determined to be 0.045m and 0.137m respectively. Subsequently, a fake irradiance profile was able to be generated that best resembled what the actual irradiance profile could be using this information for testing in COMSOL. The generated irradiance profile that output the most similar change in temperature profile as the measured in-air profile has been included as well as the change in temperature profile it produced on the blackbody screen "test mass" model in COMSOL. |
Attachment 1: Thermal_model_image.png
|
|
Attachment 2: generated_irradiance_profile.png
|
|
235
|
Mon Oct 9 11:29:37 2023 |
Tyler | Update | Electronics | PSD/CSD Plot Updates |
Continuing from Sophia's SURF Project this summer: Plotting the Power-Spectral Densities (PSDs) and Cross-Spectral Densities of two signals.
A continued issue that has been observed in the plots is the random "jump" of one PSD curves. Below, a 1.4 kHz signal is driven with a magnitude of 0.7 Vpp, and connected to the two output ports of the Red Pitaya via an SMC T-Adapter. At the moment, I anticipate that this bug might have something to do with the Real-Time GUI code being used, since this hasn't been observed when running the calculations without it (see below). |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_2023-10-09_at_11.20.25_AM.png
|
|
Attachment 2: welch_csd-2.png
|
|
243
|
Mon Oct 23 11:28:05 2023 |
Tyler | Update | Cameras | FLIR Camera Code Updates |
The past week I've been spending time going through the FLIR code on gitlab. Initially, it had appeared that our measurements with the camera had differed about 2 degrees C from what the thermocouple was giving (Ref ELOG 181). Upon inspection of the FLIR streaming code, I noticed a few issues:
1. The emissivity value wasn't set correctly (was 0.999 originally, should be about 0.95).
2. The ambient temperature was set to about 21.6 C (71 F).
3. The distance given before was about an inch off from what I measured.
These three parameters all must be manually specified to calculate the temperature values, and are what I assume caused the larger temperature difference seen before. I've attached a new set of measurements that I took below, where 6 images were taken by the camera, looking at a heating source with a current of 0.15 A being driven. The difference between the camera and the thermocouple were much smaller, as seen below. I'd still like to take a few more measurements to solidify that this has rectified the issue, but at the moment it seems this is working much better.
Images at: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1VDvZ1rfEGWsHq1AgG-chde3Cd8Do_piD?usp=sharing |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_2023-10-23_at_11.06.04_AM.png
|
|
249
|
Mon Oct 30 11:03:56 2023 |
Tyler | Update | Scripts/Programs | |
FLIR: After some adjustments, the plot generated from the FLIR measurements look much more symmetric (see attachment). There are more included grid points, which smooths out the curve as compared to last week.
Red Pitaya: It looks like a new OS update was released for the RP, which includes a new Python API (was previously only available in C). I'm going to try and update the one we have currently running in lab.
|
Attachment 1: Screenshot_2023-10-23_at_12.39.05_PM.png
|
|
255
|
Mon Nov 6 11:29:24 2023 |
Tyler | Update | Electronics | Preliminary RTD Calculations, RP Software Update |
Preliminary RTD calculations are shown below, given an input of 10 V and desiring a few mA of current. It looks like R_ref should be at least 1 kOhm (refer to plots/circuit below), keeping in mind we need to have <10 V input for the ADC.
RP: The Red Pitaya Software was updated to OS 2.00. All examples on the RP website should run without issue. |
Attachment 1: cvt.png
|
|
Attachment 2: VvC.png
|
|
Attachment 3: IMG_7471.jpg
|
|
264
|
Mon Nov 13 11:07:50 2023 |
Tyler | Update | VAC | RTD Analysis |
After initial analysis from last week on a single RTD, I then extended to looking at all 8 in series with R_ref (set to 1 kOhm). Shown below are the edge cases for the setup:
- RTDs are all at ambient lab temperature. This would correspond to a minimum resistance value.
- RTDs all read out 400 C. This gives the maximum resistance value.
The results show that indeed only a few mA of current is drawn even at room temperature (a little above 5.5 mA), and this will continue to decrease with increasing temperature. The voltage across a single terminal, at a maximum, is only about 5.4 V. |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_2023-11-13_at_11.05.45_AM.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Screenshot_2023-11-13_at_11.06.04_AM.png
|
|
271
|
Mon Nov 20 10:10:50 2023 |
Tyler | Configuration | Electronics | RTD Logic/Schematic Diagrams |
Below are a basic diagram of what the RTD measurement circuit logically looks like and an example schematic of the actual wiring. The schematic wiring will be placed internally into a chassis, connected to the RTDs via DB25 cable.
Note: The DB25 Breakout Board connector is Female, not Male. |
Attachment 1: FIN_RTD_circuit.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Sample_Circuit_Schematic.png
|
|
274
|
Tue Nov 21 14:47:24 2023 |
Tyler | Update | Lore | 1129 Workbench Assembly Update 1 |
[Tyler, Shane, Mohak, Cynthia, Luke, Michael, Luis]
Started assembly of the workbench equipment today. We completed the stools, and have constructed the frames of each workbench. All that needs to be added are the tabletops and the top shelves, which will be done on Monday. |
Attachment 1: IMG_7569.jpg
|
|
Attachment 2: IMG_7568.jpg
|
|
278
|
Mon Nov 27 14:22:30 2023 |
Tyler | Update | Lore | 1129 Assembly Update |
[Tyler, Michael, Luke, Cynthia]
The tabletops have been attached to the workbench frames. Unfortunately, one of the tabletops came out of the box with a large scratch and small dent in the middle. One of the electric top shelves is ready to be attached to the undamaged table, but the other is yet to be opened. Assembly will be completed Wednesday morning.
|
Attachment 1: IMG_7669.jpg
|
|
Attachment 2: IMG_7668.jpg
|
|
281
|
Thu Nov 30 13:50:32 2023 |
Tyler | Update | Lore | Workbench Assembly Completed |
[Tyler, Luke, Aiden]
The workbenches are now completely assembled and put into their final places. Additionally, the tool chest has been moved.
|
Attachment 1: IMG_7686.jpg
|
|
300
|
Tue Jan 9 12:08:59 2024 |
Tyler | Configuration | Electronics | RTD Readout Chassis Update |
Below is the current state of the RTD readout chassis wiring. Initial continuity tests seem good, will run through one more time to confirm.
Quote: |
The custom front and rear panels for the RTD readout chassis arrived last Friday. I installed them in the chassis frame to check their fit. They fit very well, so all that now remains is to complete the internal wiring and test the connections.
The chassis panel designs are archived to LIGO-D2300452 and LIGO-D2300453.
Quote: |
Below are a basic diagram of what the RTD measurement circuit logically looks like and an example schematic of the actual wiring. The schematic wiring will be placed internally into a chassis, connected to the RTDs via DB25 cable.
Note: The DB25 Breakout Board connector is Female, not Male. |
|
|
Attachment 1: IMG_8105.jpg
|
|
305
|
Tue Jan 16 12:20:21 2024 |
Tyler | Configuration | Electronics | RTD Readout Chassis Update 2 |
I performed another continuity test on the RTD chassis wiring, and everything seems to be set up correctly. The chassis should be ready for installation.
Quote: |
Below is the current state of the RTD readout chassis wiring. Initial continuity tests seem good, will run through one more time to confirm.
Quote: |
The custom front and rear panels for the RTD readout chassis arrived last Friday. I installed them in the chassis frame to check their fit. They fit very well, so all that now remains is to complete the internal wiring and test the connections.
The chassis panel designs are archived to LIGO-D2300452 and LIGO-D2300453.
Quote: |
Below are a basic diagram of what the RTD measurement circuit logically looks like and an example schematic of the actual wiring. The schematic wiring will be placed internally into a chassis, connected to the RTDs via DB25 cable.
Note: The DB25 Breakout Board connector is Female, not Male. |
|
|
|
Attachment 1: IMG_8146.jpg
|
|
Attachment 2: IMG_8147.jpg
|
|
310
|
Tue Jan 23 12:17:41 2024 |
Tyler | Update | Electronics | RTD Chassis |
After updating the wiring in the RTD Chassis, a signal is now seen at each ADC input. However, there seems to be a discrepancy between the voltages I measured out with the multimeter (see below). Next steps include:
- Finish final debugging
- Calibrate ADC inputs with known voltage source (likely to use DAC).
Voltage Readings:
RTD 1: 0.576 V
RTD 2: 0.578 V
RTD 3: 0.598 V
RTD 4: 0.563 V
RTD 5: 0.477 V
RTD 6: 0.463 V
RTD 7: 0.456 V
RTD 8: 0.491 V
Reference Resistor: 5.463 V
Total Voltage: 9.665 V |
Attachment 1: rtd_updated_circuitry.jpg
|
|
311
|
Tue Jan 30 11:36:19 2024 |
Tyler | Update | Electronics | RTD Chassis |
Quote: |
After updating the wiring in the RTD Chassis, a signal is now seen at each ADC input. However, there seems to be a discrepancy between the voltages I measured out with the multimeter (see below). Next steps include:
- Finish final debugging
- Calibrate ADC inputs with known voltage source (likely to use DAC).
Voltage Readings:
RTD 1: 0.576 V
RTD 2: 0.578 V
RTD 3: 0.598 V
RTD 4: 0.563 V
RTD 5: 0.477 V
RTD 6: 0.463 V
RTD 7: 0.456 V
RTD 8: 0.491 V
Reference Resistor: 5.463 V
Total Voltage: 9.665 V |
After further modification of the RTD readout chassis (i.e. adding resistors, placing reference resistor in front of RTDs), here are the following direct measurements:
RTD 1: 0.484 V
RTD 2: 0.486 V
RTD 3: 0.503 V
RTD 4: 0.474 V
RTD 5: 0.495 V
RTD 6: 0.483 V
RTD 7: 0.476 V
RTD 8: 0.510 V
Reference: 5.847 V
Here are the Cymac signal readings:
RTD 1: 74
RTD 2: 67
RTD 3: 73
RTD 4: 45
RTD 5: 82
RTD 6: 75
RTD 7: 70
RTD 8: 71
Reference: 884
The one (possible) discrepancy here is the readout for RTD 4 via Cymac, since it's signal reading is ~30 counts lower than the others. I do not believe this is a wiring issue due to the direct measurements taken. |
323
|
Tue Feb 13 11:54:45 2024 |
Tyler | Configuration | FLIR | In-Air Optical Test Configuration |
Below is the proposed schematic for FROSTI optical testing, chosen so enough space is allotted for prototype assembly.
Steps to be taken include:
- Reconstruct FLIR staging apparatus
- Move test mass stand-in to cleanroom
- Mark FLIR camera position on cleanroom optical table at correct distance
- Run ethernet cable into cleanroom
- Move FLIR aside to allow for more assembly space
- Upon assembly completion, reposition FLIR onto optical table again
Tentative plan is to begin setup early next week. |
Attachment 1: In-air_optical_test_sketch.png
|
|
324
|
Tue Feb 13 12:26:23 2024 |
Tyler | Update | Interferometer Simulations | BS Code Update |
I reproduced Cao's CE beamsplitter code (see below for example plots). I received the current info on the beamsplitter parameters for A+ and A# from GariLynn also. The next steps are to perform a similar power loss analysis on the anticipated A# beamsplitter. |
Attachment 1: thickness1.pdf
|
|
Attachment 2: bs_opd_homloss_h6cm_w2cm.pdf
|
|
331
|
Tue Feb 20 11:31:49 2024 |
Tyler | Update | Cleanroom | Garment Cabinet Door Replacement |
[Luis, Luke, Pooyan, Tyler]
The replacement door for the HEPA garment cabinet arrived last week, and was installed on Thursday. However, it looks like there's a small gap between the door and where the hinge is attached to the cabinet frame. No screws were provided with the replacement door. If we want to perform any adjustments, we have to be very careful; the screws break very easily.
|
Attachment 1: image_67190529.JPG
|
|
Attachment 2: image_67177473.JPG
|
|
338
|
Fri Feb 23 18:03:27 2024 |
Tyler | Update | FLIR | Optical Test Setup in Cleanroom |
[Tyler, Xuesi]
The FLIR and test mass stand-in have been transferred into the cleanroom. A software test will be run as soon as we get an ethernet cable long enough to reach into the cleanroom where the camera is set up. Once this is finished, the FLIR will be moved aside for construction of the FROSTI! When completed, the camera will be placed back into position for in-air optical testing.
|
Attachment 1: IMG_0941.png
|
|
344
|
Wed Feb 28 12:02:08 2024 |
Tyler | Update | General | Resistors for Heater Elements Update |
Power Res (Ohm) RTD Res (Ohm)
Heater 1= 72.8; 80.6
Heater 2= 69.5; 80.8
Heater 3= 70; 83.2
Heater 4= 70.6; 78.7
Heater 5= 69.9; 80.6
Heater 6= 71.1; 78.2
Heater 7= 68.5; 76.8
Heater 8= 70.1; 82.8
Quote: |
Power Res (Ohm) RTD Res (Ohm)
Heater 1= 73.6; 81.8
Heater 2= 70.4; 82.1
Heater 3= 71; 84.5
Heater 4= 71.5; 80
Heater 5= 70.5; 81.7
Heater 6= 72; 79.4
Heater 7= 69.2; 78.2
Heater 8= 71.1; 84.2 |
|
345
|
Wed Feb 28 17:49:18 2024 |
Tyler | Update | TCS | FROSTI Assembly - Days 2-3 |
[Aiden, Jon, Luis, Luke, Michael, Tyler]
FROSTI assembly was completed today. The RTD and power wires were terminated at the DB-25 connectors and the legs were put on. It is currently placed in front of the stand-in test mass (~5 cm away). The FLIR has also been moved back to it's nominal position. As of now, it appears there are some shorts within the power cabling. This will be a focus of tomorrow's work.
Quote: |
[Jon, Tyler, Luis, Luke, Mohak, Cynthia, Michael, Aiden]
FROSTI assembly began today. After a final set of RGA scans were taken, the vacuum chamber was vented and the reflectors were removed. The chamber was then resealed and pumped down again.
Today we completed the installation of the Macor hardware and heater elements between the two reflector halves. Tomorrow we will route, bundle, and terminate the power and sensor cables. |
|
Attachment 1: IMG_0947.png
|
|
Attachment 2: IMG_0956.png
|
|
Attachment 3: IMG_0957.png
|
|
Attachment 4: IMG_0959.png
|
|
347
|
Wed Mar 6 09:57:52 2024 |
Tyler | Update | TCS | FROSTI Wiring |
Upon finishing the FROSTI assembly last week, we ran into some electrical issues. An electrical short was found between two of the d-sub pins (2 and 8). It appears that the pins were somehow coming into contact with the aluminum surrounding them. This was causing the power supply to trip. The issue was seemingly fixed by adjusting the positioning of the cabling leading out of the reflector. When handling the device in the future, please make sure to keep the wiring as undisturbed as possible. The setup is rather fragile, and moving the cabling around could potentially reintroduce a short like this. |
349
|
Tue Mar 19 10:55:30 2024 |
Tyler | Update | FLIR | In-Air Optical Test |
Below is an image I took using the FLIR just before leaving for the LVK meeting. The profile is roughly what we would expect (annular). Any distortions seen are likely from the screen not being completely parallel to the plane of the FroSTI (i.e. the screen slightly bends in various locations). Next step: In-vacuum test at CIT. |
Attachment 1: FroSTI_Thermal_Profile.png
|
|
351
|
Thu Mar 21 16:56:42 2024 |
Tyler | Update | DAQ | RTD Parameter Calibration |
[Jon,Tyler]
We noticed that the RTD temperature readings given on the Cymac were off, and traced the issue to miscalibration in the relationship between the resistance and temperature of each RTD (Callendar-Van Dusen eqn). Below is the table of values inferred from independent measurements of temperature and resistance to rectify this problem. This data was then fitted to better determine the coefficients present in the temperature-resistance relation:
R_0 (ohm) Alpha Beta
RTD 0 80.8674 0.001315 4.273e-6
RTD 1 79.5704 0.001887 3.7873e-6
RTD 2 81.7334 0.002014 2.1724e-6
RTD 3 74.3060 0.003677 3.6022e-8
RTD 4 81.1350 0.001761 2.3598e-6
RTD 5 77.9610 0.002423 -7.5192e-7
RTD 6 78.7980 0.001373 6.2909e-6
RTD 7 83.8616 0.001890 3.3529e-6 |
Attachment 1: RTD_Calib-2.png
|
|
Attachment 2: IMG_8569.jpg
|
|