Vacuum Chamber equilibrium temperature for bake 3 are 126 C and 88 C for the chamber wall and turbo pump flange respectively. There were reached with the PID controllers both being set to 150 C.

Also noticed some discoloration around the port insulation. It could be burned from being exposed to the heater tape directly without insulation or it could be that the insulation, which looks much different, is depositing something around the ports.

The turbo pump overheated and the heating tape had to be turned off in order to get the pump back online. It was unusually hot at 52 C. Hottest it got in bake 2 was 38 C.

Did some further testing to determine if it was within reason to increase the temperature of the chamber. I used a thermometer and pulled back some insulation to test many points on the chamber. Mainly focused on the barrel and the bottom lid of the chamber to see if it was possible to increase the temperature of just the PID controller that is powering the bottom half of the chamber.

Found that the barrel of the chamber seems to be hotter than what the sensor is saying, 125 C. Found many points on the barrel that reached 140 C. I believe this is because the sensor is taped on top of the heater tape rather than in between the aluminum and the heater tape.

Also measured many points on the bottom lid as it has the same configuration the top did before it damaged the insulation. It seemed to be consistently at 150 C but I was able to find a couple points that were hotter around 160 C. These hotter spots were most likely the heater folds. There is not much we can do about this as removing the insulation for fixing would required a very invasive procedure to do it safely.

Then moved to the stainless steel tube that connects the RGA and Turbo pump lines. This tube was around 150 C but many points on it were hotter around 160 C. Before another bake I think some of the tape around the tube may need to be pulled back and relocated to avoid damaging insulation while also providing more heat to the main body of the chamber.

Measured a couple more points on the cross that connects the RGA and the full range gauge and found it to be around 130-140 C which means this section could be hotter as the electronics of the full range gauge can reach 150 C.

Over all I believe that the chamber temperature should not be increased in its current state as the bottom lid is a concern with what happened with the top in the second bake. Some optimizations could be made for a fourth bake however. Moving the temperature sensors to be between the heater tape and chamber. Pulling some of the heater tape from the stainless steel tube and relocating it to the main body of the chamber. Moving the PID temperature sensor on the tube to be on the bottom lid or another hotter spot. These are some changes I would make for a fourth bake but maybe this bake could be the last with how the second bake went.

Moved the temperature sensor on the PID controller to one of the switch backs on the lid.

Also started the next bake with both PID controllers set to 150 degC. When leaving the temperature sensors above the chamber read 119 C and 83 C. These sensors are on the chamber wall and flange in front of the turbo pump respectively.

Changed the pre filter inside of the 3 stage HEPA system next to the soldering station. It was rather dirty and I have attached images with a clean filter on the left and the used one on the right. I reset the pre filter age on the system. I tried to see if I could tell if the HEPA filter was dirty but I could not see it. I did not reset the age of the HEPA or UV stations. They are currently 378 days old.

Dr. Richardson and I took off the insulation on the lid again to add more insulation in-between the heater tape folds in addition to what was added on top of the tape after discovering discoloration. Also cleaned the lid with IPA wipes.

Also took more RGA data, one with the leak closed and one with the leak open. The graphs below this show that the SNR is improving with the ratio now looking to be around 3. The chamber is still too dirty to be commissioned and we will need to be baked again soon.

Plugged the temperature sensor back in after getting another extension cord. Removed the electronics box for the RGA as well as the full range gauge above the RGA line.

1. I was able to plot the final result with the data to the heater. I attached below the "3Combined_HighTemp_Gaussian_Plot." in this plot we can see better behavior on the Gaussian compared to the plot in ELOG 169, I was using the same data but with a different approach. On the ELOG 169, we have the center point isolated data and this new plot is the temperature more than 70 C isolated because we have a very good heater temperature distinguish do background. For the all data I got I was using a power current of 0.20A. To get the data I waited for 30 minutes until the heater became stable and after that, I started to take snaps, I took more than one snap for each one different 6 positions on the screen, and We can see the positions on ELOG 167.
2. Also I attached the calibration plot ("calibration_plot") between the measurements with the FLIR camera and thermocouple and we can see looks good if we compare the final plot.
3. For better analyses I attached a plot of the calibration line on the Gaussian plot.
4. To do: I will finish the final report.

Took some more data to look at the HC count. Initial data was from leaving the Argon leak closed and then left it open for 15 minutes and then took data for the open scenario. Attached are the graphs for these where attachment 1 is the closed scenario and attachment 2 is the open scenario.

From these graphs it looks like the signal-noise ratio of our calibration line is poor with the ratio between these two being 1.3. This means that the calibrated leak is barely being detected over the background. This should improve with more baking and pumping. I have also now attached overlayed graphs comparing the chamber when the leak is closed versus when it is open. As well as one comparing the chamber right after the bake versus the most recent data both with the leak open.

cleaning cleanroom and particle count

• 11:08 am: started particle count
  • zone 3:
    • 0.3 u: 4198
    • 0.5 u: 1080
    • 1.0 u: 581
• zone 4:
  • 0.3 u: 1247
  • 0.5 u: 623
  • 1.0 u: 415
• 11:24 am: break for removal of vac chamber insulation (pictures attached), with counts before removal as seen above, and counts after removal/replacement for zone 3 as follows:
  • zone 3:
    • 0.3 u: 2993
    • 0.5 u: 415
    • 1.0 u: 207
• 12:02 pm: began surface check and wipedown
• 12:13 pm: started vacuuming the floor
• 12:25 pm: finished vacuuming the floor
• 12:26 pm: started mopping the floor
• 12:32 pm: finished mopping the floor
• 12:32 pm: started cleaning the buckets
• 12:37 pm: started mopping with IPA wipes
• 12:43 pm: finished mopping with IPA wipes
• 12:45 pm: changed sticky floor mats
• 12:47 pm: started particle count
  • zone 3:
    • 0.3 u: 2951
    • 0.5 u: 290
    • 1.0 u: 41
• zone 4:
  • 0.3 u: 290
  • 0.5 u: 0
  • 1.0 u: 0

• Today I got more data to plot the Gaussian. So I took more snaps in each position for the six different spots than we be using to have a better calibration of the FLIR collected data. I attached the new plot below. Also, I did the same plot for each region as on the Elog 167 but I have more than 20 pics because I was using a big number of data so I just attached one example below.

To access the Elog, click here.

• Also I think we have some real (non-ideal) heat diffusion by the screen and not noise like Dr. Richardson suggested. I was testing today and we can see the first pic before the start heater source turns on, the second pic is at 120.2 C (0.31A) with the heater on and the last pic is after the heater source cooled back down to room temperature. Just in the second pic, we have a strong spot on the top, so it looks like a non-ideal diffusion.

Took another set of RGA data after the second bake has cooled down to 27 degC.

Just by visual comparison to the other graphs, the HC levels of the chamber has gone down further. I will soon overlay the data for an easier comparison.

I also reinstalled the full range gauge above the RGA line. It is still adjusting itself downwards so I will have to check again to get an accurate measurement of the pressure.

• Today I was able to plot a graph for the isolation point on the center of the heater. I got data from six different positions on the screen (I shifted the all coordinates). I extracted the data for the center point and plot the Gaussian with this extracted data for temperature. I attached the all plots below
• Also I took a snap using the black wall and with the heater at 120.1 C (0.30 A) try to have less noise but we can see this is not very good. At this temperature, we have noise on the top and I don't understand why because the heater is not in this location. I attached a snap below.

cleaning cleanroom and particle count

• 1:10 pm: started particle count
  • Zone 3:
    0.3 u: 2535
    0.5 u: 207
    1.0 u: 41
• Zone 4:
  0.3 u: 789
  0.5 u: 41
  1.0 u: 0
• 1:30 pm: began surface check and wipedown
• 1:41 pm: started vacuuming the floor
• 1:55 pm: finished vacuuming the floor
• 1:57 pm: started mopping the floor
• 2:01 pm: finished mopping the floor
• 2:02 pm: started cleaning the buckets
• 2:08 pm: started mopping with IPA wipes
• 2:17 pm: finished mopping with IPA wipes
• 2:18 pm: changed sticky floor mats
• 2:19 pm: started particle count
  • Zone 3:
    0.3 u: 3990
    0.5 u: 1080
    1.0 u: 374
• Zone 4:
  0.3 u: 540
  0.5 u: 207
  1.0 u: 0

• I was able to plot the first graph for a result between the six different positions on the screen, for now we can see the behavior of the heater temperature in a Gaussian graph with combination data between the six files.
• To do: Tyler gave me some ideas today to improve the plot. So I'm going to change the code to have insulation on the values for just the heater ("insulation") and I'm going to plot after this insulation data as well I'm going to get more data and compare with more data for the same position.
• I was using the data than I got last week and I shared on Elog (151) and we can see on this quote

• I collected data to plot a calibration with the heater. I took measurements with current and temperature (the thermocouple - thermometer) to compare with the FLIR measurements.
• I made a plot with this data and we can see how temperature vs current behaves. Note: This data I measured manually.

• I noticed that these measurements have some issues with the weather on different days. We can see in the photo attached below how different the temperatures are on different days, I took the data with the same procedure every day, but we can see the differences between them.
• To Do: I will do a new data collection using FLIR and thermocouple at the same time to plot comparison between both.

• Today I tried get data the heater with the black screen but doesn't looks possible have just one "energy" point straight to FLIR camera. Tyler and I tried different current and temperatures but keep very bad data. I attached a snap below.
• I attached a photo about the new setup below. The FLIR is in the most close point possible/safety with the heater. The heater is very close to the black wall but is not touch the screen so is safety.

The insulation on the lid of the vacuum chamber has some discoloration and it may be wise to place a sensor closer to this spot in future bakes.

Started to cool down the chamber today. Final temperature readings of the chamber were 146C and 91C for the body and cross respectively.

General information about the lab facility.

1. Changed sticky floor mats, because close to entrance the cleanroom, both sticky floor had a many died ants on top.
2. The light on top of the internet cable bridge is burned out.. I just saw this today but I am not sure if was like this before.
3. The ant bait traps seem very efficient and right now only a few ants are running around in the lab, most are dead in the bait traps, so probably in a day or two we can change those bait traps.

Aiden 3D printed a new bridge for the heater and I installed the new bridge yesterday.

I started collecting data to plot a calibration with the heater. I'm doing measurements with current and the thermocouple (thermometer) to compare with FLIR measurements and have a good calibration.

Checked on the vacuum system and it looks like it will either need to be increased in temperature or baked for a longer time. The main body is at 146C while the cross is at 91C.

In response to reports that ants have been observed in the lab, I placed five ant bait traps around the room today. Each is sitting on the floor on top of a piece of aluminum foil, in areas unlikely to be inadvertently stepped on. They contain liquid which will spill out if picked up, so please take care not to disturb them.

Update: After seeing the strong response to the first set, I redistributed them to the hottest spots and added one more trap.

Checked on the vacuum system today to change the PID controls back to their default values in order to try and get the temperature of the cross in front of the turbo pump higher. Currently it is sitting at 90 degC before changing the controls. While the main body is at 146 degC.

Will update again tomorrow on new equilibrium with the default PID settings.

Checked on the system today.

The flange on the turbo pump has reached an equilibrium temperature of 87 degC when set at 150 degC. While the main body of the chamber has reached an equilibrium temperature of 142 degC.

The temperature of the flange connecting to the turbo pump after reaching equilibrium is 74 degC. This means that it is safe to proceed with raising the temperature from 120 degC to 150 degC.

Raised the set temperature of the chamber from 120 degC to 150 degC in 15 deg steps.

Cao suggested using the project without the reflector and mask because in this case we probably got good images around the screen. So I started this yesterday and today I started to get some data to see the stabilization position and check how the parameters fluctuated. I was looking and taking snaps for an hour and a half. I'll repeat this one more time to make sure we have enough data to do analysis.

To do: The next step is to start collecting data by moving the camera FLIR and covering all six positions on the screen (2x3). Also Aiden is on hand to help and is going to make a new 3D print bridge to have good heater support.

I attached a image for the new configuration below and a snap data.

Pressure Measured Before Removing Gauge 2.31 E-7 Torr.

Went in and turned on the heating tape in increments of 30 degC until 120 degC was reached. I will let it equilibrate over night and then asses whether or not the chamber can be raised to 150 degC without having the flange to the turbo pump reach over 120 degC as it is not recommended for that flange to be any hotter.

If it can safely be raised to 150 degC, then only 2 days of baking is necessary. If 120 degC is the bake temperature, a week will be needed.

cleaning cleanroom and particle count

• 12:00 pm: started particle count
  • Zone 3:
    0.3 u: 2826
    0.5 u: 457
    1.0 u: 166
  • Zone 4:
    0.3 u: 457
    0.5 u: 83
    1.0 u: 41
• 12:17 pm: began surface check and wipedown. NOTE: found a few ants crawling up the metal table frame and on the desk
• 12:29 pm: started vacuuming the floor
• 12:45 pm: Finished vacuuming the floor
• 12:46 pm: Started mopping the floor
• 12:52 pm: Finished mopping the floor
• 12:55 pm: Started cleaning the buckets
• 1:02 pm: Started mopping with IPA wipes
• 1:11 pm: Finished mopping with IPA wipes
• 1:12 pm: Changed sticky floor mats
• 1:14 pm: started particle count
  • Zone 3:
    0.3 u: 2577
    0.5 u: 457
    1.0 u: 166
  • Zone 4:
    0.3 u: 457
    0.5 u: 41
    1.0 u: 0

Cao and Aiden put the RGA back on to the chamber and measured the outgassing rate after the chamber has cooled down from its first bake. The figure attached shows the RGA measurements with the Argon leak open.

Also put the Full Range Gauge #2 [RGA line] back onto the system to measure the pressure and got a reading of 2.78 E-7 Torr. We believe it is actually lower as the chamber temp is still at 28 degC rather than the 24 it was previously measured at. The gauge also may have needed more time to equilibrate.