cleaning cleanroom and particle count

• 5:10 pm: ran zero count test on particle counter
• 5:14 pm: started particle count

  NOTE: initial counts are significantly above allowed limit. ~10 times larger than ISO class 5 standard in the smallest size range. Realized partway through ceiling tile changes that the power/lights for some of the hepa fans in the ceiling frame had been turned off. May explain this high number. Have since turned fans back back on.

  • zone 3:
    • 0.3 u: 109208
    • 0.5 u: 16337
    • 1.0 u: 581
• zone 4:
  • 0.3 u: 51340
  • 0.5 u: 9228
  • 1.0 u: 581
• 5:33 pm: started replacing ceiling tiles
• 6:25 pm: began surface check and wipedown, including softwalls
• 6:33 pm: started vacuuming the floor
• 6:45 pm: finished vacuuming the floor
• 6:45 pm: started mopping the floor
• 6:50 pm: finished mopping the floor
• 6:52 pm: started cleaning the buckets
• 6:53 pm: started mopping with IPA wipes
• 6:58 pm: finished mopping with IPA wipes
• 6:59 pm: changed sticky floor mats
• 7:00 pm: started particle count
  • zone 3:
    • 0.3 u: 5404
    • 0.5 u: 1413
    • 1.0 u: 41
• zone 4:
  • 0.3 u: 1704
  • 0.5 u: 332
  • 1.0 u: 166

Group Meeting slides for Non-deterministic Heater Response.

I conducted separate tests on the '5015' and '3010a'. When powered individually, the '5015' outputs a signal at 33.55 MHz with an amplitude of 608 mV. It draws 1 A of current from the power source. The input signal for the '3010a' is 33.54 MHz with an amplitude of 670 mV (peak-to-peak) and a 15 mV DC offset. The output signal from channel 1 is a 65.5 kHz square wave with an amplitude of 3.28 V. The '3010a' draws 0.1 A of current.

Both the '5015' and '3010a' work fine when powered separately. However, when both are powered together, the power source behaves as if there is a short circuit. The current theory is that the switch or breaker is tripping, as it has a 1 A current rating. Since the combined current demand of both devices exceeds 1 A, this may be causing the issue.

Slides for 10/16/2024 Group Meeting

We moved Frosti into the cleanroom and debugged it to make sure everything was working. One of the DB25 pins broke off at the connector for element 1 so it needed to be recrimped. Element 6 short circuited but fixed with adjustment to the heater power pin position. We connected the power and sensor connectors to the power box and recalibrated the RTD sensors.

After taking data for each of the individual heater elements, I imported them into python and overlayed them to produce an average temperature profile. I rotated the 7 of the elements to align with element 1's profile and averaged them out. By setting the range to 28C - 33C (this gave the best visibility of the heating pattern) it gave the profile attached.

The width and location of the measured in-air change in temperature profile has been determined to be 0.045m and 0.137m respectively. Subsequently, a fake irradiance profile was able to be generated that best resembled what the actual irradiance profile could be using this information for testing in COMSOL. The generated irradiance profile that output the most similar change in temperature profile as the measured in-air profile has been included as well as the change in temperature profile it produced on the blackbody screen "test mass" model in COMSOL.

FLIR: After some adjustments, the plot generated from the FLIR measurements look much more symmetric (see attachment). There are more included grid points, which smooths out the curve as compared to last week.

Red Pitaya: It looks like a new OS update was released for the RP, which includes a new Python API (was previously only available in C). I'm going to try and update the one we have currently running in lab.

Preliminary RTD calculations are shown below, given an input of 10 V and desiring a few mA of current. It looks like R_ref should be at least 1 kOhm (refer to plots/circuit below), keeping in mind we need to have <10 V input for the ADC.

RP: The Red Pitaya Software was updated to OS 2.00. All examples on the RP website should run without issue.

After initial analysis from last week on a single RTD, I then extended to looking at all 8 in series with R_ref (set to 1 kOhm). Shown below are the edge cases for the setup:

• RTDs are all at ambient lab temperature. This would correspond to a minimum resistance value.
• RTDs all read out 400 C. This gives the maximum resistance value.

The results show that indeed only a few mA of current is drawn even at room temperature (a little above 5.5 mA), and this will continue to decrease with increasing temperature. The voltage across a single terminal, at a maximum, is only about 5.4 V.

Below are a basic diagram of what the RTD measurement circuit logically looks like and an example schematic of the actual wiring. The schematic wiring will be placed internally into a chassis, connected to the RTDs via DB25 cable.

[Tyler, Shane, Mohak, Cynthia, Luke, Michael, Luis]

The tabletops have been attached to the workbench frames. Unfortunately, one of the tabletops came out of the box with a large scratch and small dent in the middle. One of the electric top shelves is ready to be attached to the undamaged table, but the other is yet to be opened. Assembly will be completed Wednesday morning.

The workbenches are now completely assembled and put into their final places. Additionally, the tool chest has been moved.

Below is the current state of the RTD readout chassis wiring. Initial continuity tests seem good, will run through one more time to confirm.

I performed another continuity test on the RTD chassis wiring, and everything seems to be set up correctly. The chassis should be ready for installation.

After updating the wiring in the RTD Chassis, a signal is now seen at each ADC input. However, there seems to be a discrepancy between the voltages I measured out with the multimeter (see below). Next steps include:

• Finish final debugging
• Calibrate ADC inputs with known voltage source (likely to use DAC).

Voltage Readings:

RTD 1: 0.576 V

RTD 2: 0.578 V

RTD 3: 0.598 V

RTD 4: 0.563 V

RTD 5: 0.477 V

RTD 6: 0.463 V

RTD 7: 0.456 V

RTD 8: 0.491 V

Reference Resistor: 5.463 V

Total Voltage: 9.665 V

After further modification of the RTD readout chassis (i.e. adding resistors, placing reference resistor in front of RTDs), here are the following direct measurements:

RTD 1: 0.484 V

RTD 2: 0.486 V

RTD 3: 0.503 V

RTD 4: 0.474 V

RTD 5: 0.495 V

RTD 6: 0.483 V

RTD 7: 0.476 V

RTD 8: 0.510 V

Reference: 5.847 V

Here are the Cymac signal readings:

RTD 1: 74

RTD 2: 67

RTD 3: 73

RTD 4: 45

RTD 5: 82

RTD 6: 75

RTD 7: 70

RTD 8: 71

Reference: 884

The one (possible) discrepancy here is the readout for RTD 4 via Cymac, since it's signal reading is ~30 counts lower than the others. I do not believe this is a wiring issue due to the direct measurements taken.

Below is the proposed schematic for FROSTI optical testing, chosen so enough space is allotted for prototype assembly.

Steps to be taken include:

1. Reconstruct FLIR staging apparatus
2. Move test mass stand-in to cleanroom
3. Mark FLIR camera position on cleanroom optical table at correct distance
4. Run ethernet cable into cleanroom
5. Move FLIR aside to allow for more assembly space
6. Upon assembly completion, reposition FLIR onto optical table again

Tentative plan is to begin setup early next week.

I reproduced Cao's CE beamsplitter code (see below for example plots). I received the current info on the beamsplitter parameters for A+ and A# from GariLynn also. The next steps are to perform a similar power loss analysis on the anticipated A# beamsplitter.

The replacement door for the HEPA garment cabinet arrived last week, and was installed on Thursday. However, it looks like there's a small gap between the door and where the hinge is attached to the cabinet frame. No screws were provided with the replacement door. If we want to perform any adjustments, we have to be very careful; the screws break very easily.

The FLIR and test mass stand-in have been transferred into the cleanroom. A software test will be run as soon as we get an ethernet cable long enough to reach into the cleanroom where the camera is set up. Once this is finished, the FLIR will be moved aside for construction of the FROSTI! When completed, the camera will be placed back into position for in-air optical testing.

Heater 1= 72.8; 80.6

Heater 2= 69.5; 80.8

Heater 3= 70; 83.2

Heater 4= 70.6; 78.7

Heater 5= 69.9; 80.6

Heater 6= 71.1; 78.2

Heater 7= 68.5; 76.8

Heater 8= 70.1; 82.8

FROSTI assembly was completed today. The RTD and power wires were terminated at the DB-25 connectors and the legs were put on. It is currently placed in front of the stand-in test mass (~5 cm away). The FLIR has also been moved back to it's nominal position. As of now, it appears there are some shorts within the power cabling. This will be a focus of tomorrow's work.

Upon finishing the FROSTI assembly last week, we ran into some electrical issues. An electrical short was found between two of the d-sub pins (2 and 8). It appears that the pins were somehow coming into contact with the aluminum surrounding them. This was causing the power supply to trip. The issue was seemingly fixed by adjusting the positioning of the cabling leading out of the reflector. When handling the device in the future, please make sure to keep the wiring as undisturbed as possible. The setup is rather fragile, and moving the cabling around could potentially reintroduce a short like this.

We noticed that the RTD temperature readings given on the Cymac were off, and traced the issue to miscalibration in the relationship between the resistance and temperature of each RTD (Callendar-Van Dusen eqn). Below is the table of values inferred from independent measurements of temperature and resistance to rectify this problem. This data was then fitted to better determine the coefficients present in the temperature-resistance relation:

       R_0 (ohm)   Alpha    Beta

RTD 0   80.8674   0.001315   4.273e-6

RTD 1   79.5704   0.001887   3.7873e-6

RTD 2   81.7334   0.002014   2.1724e-6

RTD 3   74.3060   0.003677   3.6022e-8

RTD 4   81.1350   0.001761   2.3598e-6

RTD 5   77.9610   0.002423   -7.5192e-7

RTD 6   78.7980   0.001373   6.2909e-6

RTD 7   83.8616   0.001890   3.3529e-6

       R_0 (ohm)   Alpha (1/C)

RTD 0   79.3962   0.002031

RTD 1   78.2874   0.002530

RTD 2   80.9775   0.002381

RTD 3   74.2947   0.003684

RTD 4   80.3199   0.002157

RTD 5   78.2106   0.002297

RTD 6   76.6825   0.002438

RTD 7   82.6645   0.002458

Measurements taken can be found here. An uncertainty of 1 C was assumed for temperature.

Another re-fit, but this time the quadratic coefficient (beta) is set to 1.003e-6:

       R_0 (ohm)   Alpha (1/C)

RTD 0   79.7386   0.001863

RTD 1   78.6248   0.002359

RTD 2   81.3254   0.002211

RTD 3   74.6127   0.003509

RTD 4   80.6652   0.001988

RTD 5   78.5450   0.002127

RTD 6   77.0144   0.002268

RTD 7   83.0204   0.002288

Today the FROSTI RTD readout chassis underwent a redesign:

Instead of the original ratiometric method, which involved wiring the FROSTI RTDs in series, each element is individually powered by separate excitations. Each element additionally possesses its own reference resistor of 100 Ohm. Now, if an RTD experiences an electrical short, it should not affect the measurements of the others in sequence, as it had with the original design.

Some changes have been made to the FLIR readout code to help improve its functionality:

• More accurate temperature readings than before due to updates in the calculation procedure. A bug was causing one of the parameters to not update correctly; this is now fixed.
• Saved data now stored in HDF5 files rather than CSV.
• User can now enable automatic data storage by specifying a collection interval (in minutes). The choice of manually saving data is still present if desired.

Attached below are the initial results of the CIT FROSTI testing analysis.

Upon further inspection, one adjustment was made to the FROSTI profile analysis: changing the transmission value of the ZnSe viewport. It was initially assumed that the viewport possessed an AR coating, which would bring the transmission into the 90% range. Without the coating, it drops to roughly 70%. Assuming no coating, the estimated delivered power was calculated to be 11.7 W. This is consistent with the estimated power given from the Hartmann sensor analysis, thus it is believed that the viewport indeed had no coating.

Using the data taken during the FROSTI testing at Caltech, I attempted to find a better calibration of the RTD sensors, given our past issues with inaccurate readings. The fit parameters, alpha and beta, are still all different from the initial values given to us by Fralock (alpha = .003, beta = 1.003e-6, R_0 was not given), but the true values will differ based on factors such as part geometry.

I have begun moving parts into the cleanroom for the upcoming FROSTI RIN tests that will be conducted within the next few weeks. While waiting for the rest of the equipment to arrive to perform the full-scale tests, I have additionally moved the FROSTI under the shelf above the optical table, where it will stay for the meantime. As always, please use caution when in the cleanroom. Aside from the FROSTI, the IR photodetectors that will be used for the test are delicate and costly to replace.

For some preliminary tests, I moved the IR photodetectors outside of the cleanroom and onto the other optical table. The basic goal was to obtain a signal from both photodetectors. To achieve this, one of the heater cartridges used for early FLIR measurements months ago was hooked up to a power supply (PS). The PS was set to supply 0.20 A with a voltage of 2.8 V; the corresponding power is thus 0.56 W. With this, I was able to measure a signal using the Red Pitaya, the device that will be used for following RIN measurements.

The timing chassis used for the cymac has been shut off due to an unknown issue causing its supplied current to fluctuate. All real-time models will be suspended until a solution is found.

Below is the dark noise spectrum of the Red Pitaya, which was measured over the course of a weekend. Additionally, I have successfully measured a signal from the photodetectors with the FROSTI as the IR source, so it seems there shouldn't be any worry of these particular detectors not being feasible for the RIN measurement.

A quick update on the effective emissivity analysis for the CIT FROSTI testing:

I was able to (roughly) match the OPD data to a referenced COMSOL model, with an applied power of 12.6 W (as seen below). However, when changing the emissivity of the ETM in COMSOL, the dT profiles do not seem to change much. I am not sure as to why this is the case at the moment, and will continue to look further.

Additionally attached are the current RIN measurements of the FROSTI prototype. Shown is the PSDs of both channels, in reference to their individual backgrounds.