ID |
Date |
Author |
Type |
Category |
Subject |
489
|
Sat Dec 14 07:58:25 2024 |
Luis | Update | VAC | Vacuum sytem staus and Viton O-rings |
[Luis]
RGA Volume: T = 23°C, P = 1.71e-9 Torr
Main Volume: T = 22°C, P = 5.71e-9 Torr
On 12/13 I took another RGA scan to verify the state of the vacuum system and to see whether the degassing of the filament had worked. The results of the scan shows that we did get an overall improvement of the noise levels, though we still have some peaks that are higher than the rest.
Also, while I was around, I transferred the Viton O-rings to a bag and labeled it properly. They are ready to be put into the clean room. |
490
|
Mon Dec 16 21:32:21 2024 |
Luis | Update | VAC | MR Testing |
[Luis, Luke]
The MR material was placed in the vacuum chamber following standard procedures to ensure the vacuum remained as clean as possible. During this process, we only opened the main
volume while keeping the gate valve between the two volumes closed to maintain the UHV in the RGA section.
An RGA scan was taken before this process, this will be used to compare the state of the vacuum with the sample inside to determine whether the MR material is vacuum compatible. |
491
|
Tue Dec 17 13:53:53 2024 |
Luis | Update | VAC | Vacuum system status |
[Luis]
The vacuum system is being baked. I disconnected the digital gages and the magnets, opened the Ar leak and started the bake by taking the temperature from 60C-90C-125C waiting about 15-20 minutes between each interval. The RGA electronics were left on since the temperature of the flange was 36.6C (bellow the 60C threshold) |
493
|
Thu Dec 19 12:00:44 2024 |
Luke | Update | VAC | End of bake |
The vacuum chamber has stopped baking.
Current state as of 11:40, 12/19/2024:
The gate valve is open, and the filament of the RGA is on.
The temperatures were steady at:
PID right: barrel upper: 129°C, RGA volume: 125°C
PID left: barrel lower: 125°C, Lid: 114°C
The RGA flange was 37°C
Cleanroom was 26°C
Note the upper barrel was very close to the emergency shut off temp of 130°C. In the future we may want to either rewire some of the heating tape or lower the set temperature of the right PID controller.
Luis and I are planning on taking an RGA scan of the MR on Sunday before the campus shuts down for the holidays. |
494
|
Sun Dec 22 20:43:35 2024 |
Luis | Update | VAC | MR Testing |
[Luis, Luke]
RGA Volume: T = 23°C, P = 3.0e-9 Torr
Main Volume: T = 22°C, P = 9.90e-9 Torr
After letting the vacuum cool down for a couple days, we reattached the magnets and sensors, then we performed a RGA scan of the vacuum system, now containing the MR sample. The results are attached below. Something to notice is that we are technically not under UHV, though Luke and I believe the reading of the sensor is not completely accurate since it was still coming to a steady state, further test will be performed when the physics building is open again.
|
496
|
Thu Jan 2 17:52:58 2025 |
Luis | Update | VAC | MR Testing Continuation |
[Luis, Luke]
RGA Volume: T = 22°C, P = 2.10e-9 Torr
Main Volume: T = 21°C, P = 5.71e-9 Torr
Measurements of the current state of the vacuum systems were taken today, now that the system had reached UHV status, the results are attached bellow. The first plot overlays the data of the empty chamber taken on 12/16/24 before inserting the MR material, and the data of the system today, with the MR inside. The second plot displays the S/N Ratio of the system. The last plot displays the data of the system with the Ar leak open and closed. Notice that it is common for the Ar leak close data to fail due to the calculation of the gas flux per unit ion current, which is dependent on the Ar peak.
|
509
|
Fri Feb 7 12:25:56 2025 |
Luke | Summary | VAC | Started bake |
[Luke, Luis]
The vacuum chamber is currently baking.
We stepped up to 120°C by increments of 30°C starting at 60°C. We took about an hour break at 90°C to let the temperatures equilibrate.
Current state as of 12:20:
The gate valve is open, the calibrated Argon leak is open, and the filament of the RGA is on.
The temperatures are as follows:
PID right barrel upper: 113°C, RGA volume: 120°C
PID left barrel lower: 121°C, Lid: 114°C
The lower temperatures should climb as the whole system heats up.
|
510
|
Tue Feb 11 08:07:02 2025 |
Luis | Update | VAC | Bake stopped |
[Luis, Ma]
Feb/10/25 4:00pm
Bake was stopped.
|
511
|
Fri Feb 14 11:57:50 2025 |
Luis | Update | VAC | Vacuum Update |
[Luis]
Feb/11/25 9:30am
Pressure gages were connected.
|
512
|
Fri Feb 14 12:15:23 2025 |
Luis | Update | VAC | Vacuum sytem staus |
[Luis, Luke, Ma]
February 12, 2025 - 4:00 PM
We performed an RGA scan with the vacuum system containing the heater elements. The results are attached below.
|
Pressure (Torr) |
Temperature (°C) |
RGA Volume |
3.13 × 10⁻⁹ |
23 |
Main Volume |
6.15 × 10⁻⁹ |
23 |
As we can see, we are not yet under cleanliness standards. The passing threshold is 4 × 10⁻¹⁰, and we are currently measuring nearly double this value. We will continue performing scans to monitor any changes in these readings.
|
517
|
Tue Feb 18 11:19:13 2025 |
Luke | Configuration | VAC | Repositioning of the lid's temperature probe |
Before the recent bake I slightly repositioned the temperature probe on the lid from beside the heater tape to under the heater tape. This was done to better know and control the temperatures of the chamber while baking. It has appeared to work with the temperatures being held very close to the 120C target. |
519
|
Thu Feb 20 17:07:36 2025 |
Luis | Update | VAC | RGA Scan |
[Ma, Luis]
February 20, 2025 - 3:30 PM
Ma performed an RGA scan with the vacuum system containing the heater elements. The results are attached below.
|
Pressure (Torr) |
Temperature (°C) |
RGA Volume |
1.87× 10⁻⁹ |
23 |
Main Volume |
5.70 × 10⁻⁹ |
23 |
As we can see, we are not yet under cleanliness standards. The passing threshold is 4 × 10⁻¹⁰, we are very close to it.
|
522
|
Mon Feb 24 17:50:13 2025 |
Luis | Update | VAC | RGA Scan |
[Ma, Luis]
February 24, 2025 - 1:00PM
Ma performed an RGA scan with the vacuum system containing the heater elements. The results are attached below.
|
Pressure (Torr) |
Temperature (°C) |
RGA Volume |
3.31 × 10⁻⁹ |
25 |
Main Volume |
5.75 × 10⁻⁹ |
24 |
|
563
|
Mon Apr 28 22:08:28 2025 |
Luis | Update | VAC | Vacuum Leak Test result |
[Ma, Luke, Luis]
April 24, 2025
3:00 PM
Ma and Luis attempted to connect to the RGA to initialize the leak test but encountered some difficulties.
3:20 PM
After restarting both the computer and the RGA, we realized that the DB9 cable was not connected to Spica. After connecting it, we had no further issues communicating with the RGA.
3:30 PM
Luke and Luis performed the leak test. There were no significant leaks in the vacuum system. The highest leak rates we found are listed in the table below; the rest of the entries were limited by noise, as we could not detect any change in the program after spraying the ports with He.
Connection |
Leak rate (torr) |
ZLR(2.75"-4.5") - Reducing Cross |
6.0e-12 |
Cross - Turbo Pump (small) |
1.4e-11 |
Port - Pressure Sensor |
8.0e-12 |
|
566
|
Wed Apr 30 15:43:56 2025 |
Luis | Update | VAC | Vacuum Update |
[Ma, Luke, Luis]
April 29, 2025
3:30 PM
We performed another leak test on the vacuum system, this time focusing on the welds around the main cylinder. The leaks from these junctions were in the mid 10⁻¹¹ range, but we noticed some strange behavior after completing the test. The partial pressure of He kept rising at a slow, constant rate for a while—even after stopping the test for about 15–20 minutes and restarting the measurement. We're not sure what’s causing this and wanted to check in before moving forward with the bake.
4:30 PM
We performed an RGA of the system (see below) and the findings are that there was a higher contraction of He than usual. We have attached another scan from 2/24/25 for reference.
5:00 PM
We turned off the electron multiplier and closed the RGA Program. |
567
|
Wed Apr 30 17:33:14 2025 |
Xuesi Ma | Update | VAC | Started bake |
[Luke, Ma, Tyler]
The vacuum chamber is currently baking.
Current state as of 5:00
The gate valve is open, and the filament of the RGA is on. Argon leak is opened
The temperatures are as follows:
PID right barrel upper: 99°C, RGA volume: 120°C
PID left barrel lower: 123°C, Lid: 92°C |
568
|
Fri May 2 12:34:02 2025 |
Xuesi Ma | Update | VAC | Stopped bake |
The vacuum chamber has stopped baking.
Current state as of 12:30, 5/2/2025:
The gate valve is open, and the filament of the RGA is on.
The temperatures were steady at:
PID right: barrel upper: 108°C, RGA volume: 120°C
PID left: barrel lower: 120°C, Lid: 91°C |
573
|
Thu May 8 17:41:56 2025 |
Luis | Update | VAC | RGA Scan Post Bake |
[Ma, Luis]
After taking the RGA scans of the new system, here are the results of the raw and normalized data.We can see that in the post baked system the He peak is way lower, and the peaks around 20AMU are also significantly lower. |
11
|
Mon Oct 3 17:21:39 2022 |
Cao | Update | TCS | Inspection of macor parts |
The macor parts arrived and inspected today. These include:
- Macor spacer (drawing:
LIGO_Redesign_Macor_Spacer_Drawing_v4.pdf attached below), quantities: 40
- No defects, damages observed
- Parts are free from grease/ machining fluid
- Wall thickness of 1 mm appear to provide sufficient stiffness to part
- Images of parts:
Macor_spacer_0.jpg, Macor_spacer_1.jpg
- Macor 5-40 UNC screw (drawing:
LIGO_Redesign_Macor_Screw_Drawing_v6.pdf attached below), quantities: 20
- One screw broke, location of break: should edge between head and shaft (see image
Macor_screw_5.jpg )
- All other screws look ok, no damage observed, clean surface overall
- Images:
Macor_screw_0.jpg , Macor_screw_4.jpg
|
173
|
Thu Jul 27 10:18:43 2023 |
Celeste | Update | TCS | Graphical Updates to HOM RH Modification |
Attached are updated graphs of the irradiance distribution from the 1/8th ring heater units (extruded and reduced in length). |
180
|
Fri Jul 28 17:45:45 2023 |
Celeste | Update | TCS | Graphical Updates to HOM RH Modification, Friday 7/28 |
Updated 1/8th Heater simulation modification graphs. Slides 7, 10, 16-19 are new additions. |
187
|
Tue Aug 1 16:22:35 2023 |
Celeste | Update | TCS | Graphical Updates to HOM RH Modification, Tuesday 8/1 |
Slides 20-33 are newly added (data/graphs from parameter sweep feature-1/8th heater unit length varied from 10% of original to 100% of original). |
200
|
Thu Aug 10 14:13:38 2023 |
Celeste | Update | TCS | 8/10/23, Simulation Graphical Progress |
|
204
|
Fri Aug 11 10:57:20 2023 |
Celeste | Update | TCS | 8/11/23 Simulation Progress |
|
209
|
Tue Aug 15 16:10:06 2023 |
Celeste | Update | TCS | 8/15/2023 Simulation Progress |
|
291
|
Mon Dec 11 16:20:17 2023 |
Jon | Summary | TCS | FROSTI Assembly Procedure |
Below is the procedure we will follow to assemble the FROSTI prototype.
- Install SS guide rods and bottom Macor spacers in bottom reflector
- Install AlN elements on top of bottom Macor spacers
- Install upper Macor spacers on top of AlN elements
- Feed unterminated power and RTD leads through slots in upper reflector
- Install upper reflector, using guide rods to slowly lower into position
- Install vented SS bolts for reflectors; Macor bolts for heater elements
- Remove SS guide rods
- Bundle power and sensing cable with PEEK cable ties and SS cable mounts
- Terminate power and sensing cable bundles with PEEK DB25M connectors
|
341
|
Mon Feb 26 21:23:27 2024 |
Jon | Update | TCS | FROSTI Assembly - Day 1 |
[Jon, Tyler, Luis, Luke, Mohak, Cynthia, Michael, Aiden]
FROSTI assembly began today. After a final set of RGA scans were taken, the vacuum chamber was vented and the reflectors were removed. The chamber was then resealed and pumped down again.
Today we completed the installation of the Macor hardware and heater elements between the two reflector halves. Tomorrow we will route, bundle, and terminate the power and sensor cables. |
345
|
Wed Feb 28 17:49:18 2024 |
Tyler | Update | TCS | FROSTI Assembly - Days 2-3 |
[Aiden, Jon, Luis, Luke, Michael, Tyler]
FROSTI assembly was completed today. The RTD and power wires were terminated at the DB-25 connectors and the legs were put on. It is currently placed in front of the stand-in test mass (~5 cm away). The FLIR has also been moved back to it's nominal position. As of now, it appears there are some shorts within the power cabling. This will be a focus of tomorrow's work.
Quote: |
[Jon, Tyler, Luis, Luke, Mohak, Cynthia, Michael, Aiden]
FROSTI assembly began today. After a final set of RGA scans were taken, the vacuum chamber was vented and the reflectors were removed. The chamber was then resealed and pumped down again.
Today we completed the installation of the Macor hardware and heater elements between the two reflector halves. Tomorrow we will route, bundle, and terminate the power and sensor cables. |
|
347
|
Wed Mar 6 09:57:52 2024 |
Tyler | Update | TCS | FROSTI Wiring |
Upon finishing the FROSTI assembly last week, we ran into some electrical issues. An electrical short was found between two of the d-sub pins (2 and 8). It appears that the pins were somehow coming into contact with the aluminum surrounding them. This was causing the power supply to trip. The issue was seemingly fixed by adjusting the positioning of the cabling leading out of the reflector. When handling the device in the future, please make sure to keep the wiring as undisturbed as possible. The setup is rather fragile, and moving the cabling around could potentially reintroduce a short like this. |
442
|
Mon Sep 16 14:59:51 2024 |
Tyler | Update | TCS | FLIR RIN Update 09/16 |
Below is the dark noise spectrum of the Red Pitaya, which was measured over the course of a weekend. Additionally, I have successfully measured a signal from the photodetectors with the FROSTI as the IR source, so it seems there shouldn't be any worry of these particular detectors not being feasible for the RIN measurement. |
453
|
Wed Oct 2 12:20:43 2024 |
Tyler | Update | TCS | Updated FROSTI Analysis 10/02/2024 |
Attached below are updates on current FROSTI prototype analysis. |
457
|
Wed Oct 9 13:52:31 2024 |
Tyler | Update | TCS | RIN Update 10/09/2024 |
I tried adjusting the gain settings on the photodetectors to check if this would help improve the RIN spectra measurements. Overall, it doesn't look like it does, and if anything, looks worse. I assume this is so because as the gain is lowered, the amount of detectable signal from the FROSTI becomes smaller and smaller. |
492
|
Wed Dec 18 15:41:56 2024 |
Tyler | Update | TCS | FROSTI RIN |
[Tyler]
I have begun the (hopefully) final RIN measurements at 3:30 PM today. If you need to go into the cleanroom at any time between now and Sunday (the 22nd), please do not touch the FROSTI, the Red Pitaya, the photodetectors, or any of the wiring. |
495
|
Mon Dec 23 14:33:36 2024 |
Tyler | Update | TCS | Latest RIN Measurement Results |
Attached below are the measurements I took from the FROSTI from 12/18-12/22. |
498
|
Tue Jan 14 10:27:14 2025 |
Tyler | Update | TCS | RIN Updates |
[Tyler]
Attached below are updated plots for the FROSTI RIN measurements for Jan 14 group meeting.
|
499
|
Fri Jan 17 13:27:07 2025 |
Tyler | Update | TCS | FROSTI Pre-disassembly |
[Tyler, Ma, Cece, Jon, Luke, Cynthia, Michael]
On Tuesday, we prepared the FROSTI for disassembly in anticipation of the APS filming that is set to take place in the labs. The FROSTI has been unbolted from the optical table in the cleanroom, with its wires weighted down and the majority of its screws removed to ensure an easy removal of the reflectors during the filming process.
|
501
|
Wed Jan 22 10:50:08 2025 |
Tyler | Update | TCS | FROSTI Disassembly |
[Tyler, Ma, Cece, Luis, Shane, Luke, Cynthia, Liu, Jon]
On Tuesday (Jan 21), we took the FROSTI apart in front of a filming crew. It was a success! The footage is going to be used in an APS video detailing the experimental cosmology research conducted in the department.
The FROSTI reflectors, heater elements, and legs were all bagged separately and a currently being stored in the cleanroom. If you need to do any work in there, please be mindful of these parts. The elements are currently on the shelf above the optical table, and the reflectors are placed on the table in the back corner. |
516
|
Tue Feb 18 10:12:39 2025 |
Tyler | Update | TCS | Final RIN Plot Update |
Below is a preview of the final RIN figure that will be included in the FROSTI instrument paper. A quick summary of what is shown below:
The original RIN CSD measurement is shown on the top panel in red. Frequency bins that exhibit external electronics noise (ex. ADC, photodetector noise, etc.) are identified and shaded in gray. These noisy bins are then excluded from the dataset before beginning the next step in the analysis process: rebinning. Here, the resolution of the spectrum can be changed by averaging frequency bins together within a specified interval, with the goal of pushing the measurement curve closer to the A+ requirement shown in the figure. For demonstration below, the spectrum goes from a resolution of ~0.93 Hz to 14.90 Hz.
|
531
|
Tue Mar 4 10:28:58 2025 |
Tyler | Update | TCS | RIN Plot Updates |
|
542
|
Tue Mar 25 12:56:47 2025 |
Tyler | Update | TCS | FROSTI Analysis Finalization |
Upon final review of the FROSTI analysis included in the (hopefully) soon-to-be submitted instrument paper, I've made some adjustments to the reflectivity analysis that estimates the amount of power delivered to the test mass by the FROSTI. Initially, as detailed in elog 447, the delivered power was approximated to be 12.6 W (later adjusted to 12.9 W), with roughly 18% of this power being reflected by the test mass. After some final adjustments, this value now is closer to 12.0 W, with 10.2 W absorbed (15% power reflection). Below is a table showing the updated values for the FROSTI prototype tests:
|
Old Value |
New Value |
Delivered Power |
12.9 W |
12.0 W |
Absorbed Power |
10.6 W (18% reflectivity) |
10.2 W (15% reflectivity) |
Measured Peak Temperature Difference |
5.39 +/- 0.03 K |
5.26 +/- 0.03 K |
Model Peak Temperature Difference |
5.42 K |
5.21 K |
Measured Peak OPD |
765 +/- 9 nm |
771 +/- 7 nm |
Model Peak OPD |
630 nm |
654 nm |
|
577
|
Tue May 13 12:41:06 2025 |
Tyler | Update | TCS | A# Profiles Update |
Slides on the A# ITM FROSTI profile modeling efforts can be found here. |
600
|
Fri Jun 27 15:38:22 2025 |
Christina | Update | TCS | FROSTI Reconstruction |
[Tyler, Ma, Christina, Luke]
We threaded the wiring of the heater elements through the reflective surfaces and were able to attach each piece with the Macor spacers and connect both sides. We used the guide rails and screws to ensure proper alignment. The only necessary step left is to add the additional external screws for the reconstruction. |
601
|
Tue Jul 1 11:04:00 2025 |
Christina | Update | TCS | FROSTI Reconstruction II |
[Ma, Tyler, Christina]
Finished external reconstruction of the FROSTI by installing all the pins to the 2 DB 25 connectors. To ensure everything was operating correctly, we did electrical testing by testing continuity and by checking each of the heater elements' RTD and power resistance values and comparing them to what was tabulated in January. Additionally, we organized the wires and added the stands. |
602
|
Tue Jul 1 12:39:42 2025 |
Tyler | Update | TCS | A# FROSTI Profile Optimization Update |
[Tyler, Liu]
Slides |
162
|
Tue Jul 18 14:13:46 2023 |
Sophia | Update | Scripts/Programs | Update on Laser Noise Data Collection and Analysis |
We [Sophia and Tyler] have found a code which will partition our data and generate PSD's and CSD's automatically. We are now in the stage of writing this into a dynamic code, which so far has been fast-paced because of the framework we have built for it over the past few weeks.
Something to note is that we have found, especially over long periods of time, the laser goes through periods of extreme noise and the signals often cross from where we set them at some point throughout our data collection. We have made the assumption that this is something to do with the laser itself, and not our setup or surrounding space because of both the times that these noise/intensity spikes took place and the duration of the spikes (1.5-2.5 hours). To try and correct for this, we have been "cutting" the noise, and just looking at sections which don't include these big fluctuations. An example of the "noise cut data" is shown in the graph titled "Signals Over Time 7-18-23 Noise Cut Data" and all of the PSD/CSD graphs have been made using only these "noise cut" regions. |
174
|
Thu Jul 27 11:28:36 2023 |
Sophia | Update | Scripts/Programs | Update on Laser Noise Data Collection and Analysis: Dynamic CSD and PSD Plots |
This week I have successfully been able to implement our dynamic CSD and PSD plotting code, but along the way I encountered a few challenges which I will outline in this elog post.
Challenges:
1. Once I was able to plot the data through time, I produced a graph of the raw data (shown below in the top to images) which showed pulsed data instead of a continuous stream. On Tuesday (26th of July) Tyler and I fixed this issue, realizing that calling the starting the trigger in the red pitaya was the issue. When I commented that line of code out, it immediately started plotting continuously.
2. When that issue was solved, We then started having problems with the automatically generated lines in the python program which would double back on each new iteration. I am still dealing with this issue, because the line likes to follow the progression of the data intake instead of through the plot. Currently, I am trying to plot the data as a scatter plot and then add the line as this might make it care only about the data's distribution instead of the order of the points in the list, but I am still unsure. I might try out np.sort (or some equivalent to sort the entire data set before plotting) as well. |
175
|
Thu Jul 27 14:11:42 2023 |
Sophia | Update | Scripts/Programs | Update on Laser Noise Data Collection and Analysis: Dynamic CSD and PSD Plots |
Here's a screen recording of the dynamic raw data and PSD/CSD plots as they are now. Will begin working on implementing a code to generate the statistical estimator for the CSD uncertainty now. (Will talk to Tyler more about whether I can get the lines to happen or not) |
183
|
Mon Jul 31 19:27:30 2023 |
Sophia | Update | Scripts/Programs | Update on Laser Noise Data Collection and Analysis: Dynamic CSD and PSD Plots |
An update on the CSD/PSD code:
The code is now taking a dynamic average of the points, and that has significantly reduced the noise that we were reading and the issues I was having with the lines in the plots. The graph for the CSD is still putting up a fight though, and amassing many lines that do not appear when just scatter plotted. I plan to fix that tomorrow, alongside inserting my own generated signal into the data. I have plotted the coherence alongside these graphs (as shown in the first screen recording and in one of the images), and it is significantly less than 1-- starting at or below 10^(-1).
As a note, I am unsure of why the raw data looks like this-- the laser goes through periods of extreme noise and I think this data was taken during one of them. |
186
|
Tue Aug 1 15:44:31 2023 |
Sophia | Update | Scripts/Programs | Update on Laser Noise Data Collection and Analysis: Dynamic CSD and PSD Plots |
We have identified two problems facing the intensity noise calculations, which we are working to solve.
The first of these problems, is that the red pitaya appears to be taking data approximately 4 times faster than we would expect from the decimation rate based on how quickly it runs. To see if this was affecting our data, we plugged the red pitaya into a function generator. We found that my code is able to identify the driving frequency, but consistently gives predictions that are roughly 7% greater than we expect. When we drive at 100 Hz, the plot says the peak is at 107 Hz, when driven at 400 Hz, we see between 422-427 Hz, etc. While this implies that the red pitaya is not taking data at a faster rate than we would expect (if it did we would anticipate a lower than expected frequency, by a factor of roughly 4), it does imply some intrinsic issue with either the red pitaya or with the code. To fix this, I am going to use my code on artificially generated signals and see if we still observe these issues. |
194
|
Mon Aug 7 15:36:18 2023 |
Sophia | Update | Scripts/Programs | Update on Laser Noise Data Collection and Analysis: Dynamic CSD and PSD Plots |
Today I was able to fix the red pitaya's plotting problem, and get my code to recognize driving frequencies from the function generator to within a 0.5 Hz estimation. The sinusoidal plots I have included are from sending a 1 Hz signal into the red pitaya to see the signal in real time. This allowed me to see exactly where the system was messing up, and fix from the ground up. Once I had that working, I began to test sending in frequencies in the range that my PSD/CSD code could observe and I was able to identify each driving frequency within 0.5 Hz. My code was able to correctly identify a 500 Hz signal, while other analyzed frequencies in the observable range have fallen lower than the sent in frequency by a less than 0.5 Hz. I believe this issue comes from the strange speed that the red pitaya is still acquiring data, even with my fixing it to now observe a continuous signal. |