Heating system

Wiping the heater system parts.
• 04:37 pm: Started wiping the electronic device part for the heater system (HL101 Series Digital Benchtop temperature limit control).
• 05:19 pm: Finished wiping the parts to the heater system (HL101 Series Digital Benchtop temperature limit control). I wiped the HL101 Series Digital Benchtop temperature limit control and I didn't bagged and tagged because we should install that soon.
• 05:23 pm: I putted heater electronic device inside the cleanroom without the bag. Also the electronic device is near to the vacuum chamber and the other parts to heater system.
• I attached the photo below.

• 02:09 pm: Turned on the device (current on)
• 02:42 pm: Started taking snap on position one (Reference point: 0,-0.062). Parameters:0.10A,1.5V,41.5C
• I took multiplier snap on the same position for compare after on data analyzes. I just wanted one/two minute break between the snaps. I did that same for every position.
• 02:55 pm: Started taking snap on position two (Reference point:-0.10,-0.062 ). Parameters: 0.10A,1.5v,43 C
• 03:01 pm: Started taking snap on position three (Reference point:0.05 ,-0.062). Parameters: 0.1A,1.4V,42.8C
• 03:07 pm: Started taking snap on position four (Reference point: 0.05,0.045). Parameters:0.10A,1.5V,43.6 C
• 03:15 pm: Started taking snap on position five (Reference point: 0,0.045). Parameters:0.10A, 1.4V, 44.1C
• 03:22 pm: Started taking snap on position six (Reference point: 0,0.045). Parameters: 0.10A,1.4V,43.3 C
• We can see in the photos attached below than have some differences between every position so I should be starting analyzes on that.

[Pamella]

Yesterday, I did a new data collection. I could get a better data in this time and I realized than I need use some angle on the reflector for got a better shot. I need do that because the FLIR camera just is able to get the triangle shape for complete if I keep exactly in same line for center point on the camera but for the data now I need move the refletor to go up and go down. So wasn't working very well if I keep the reflector without angle.

Now I am using the refletor with a angle. In the more high part I turn the mask for look the table and in the lower part I turn the mask to look up. I attached a photo below for this configuration. Also the processes to get the data was the same than I using last time, the only diference is now I just moved the pillar after get data for high position and lower position for the same reference point on the triangle shape.

Note: In most data it is impossible to keep the same parameter for current, voltage and temperature. Most have a small variation but not a big difference. For example: I got the temperature in the first position 46.8 °C and in the second position I got 47.1 °C, it's just an example. It's just so we know that we don't have the exact same parameters all the time. In my opinion this is not a problem because it is just a small variation.

The process to get data

• 09:35 am: Turned on the device (current on). I wanted for 30 minutes before start get data.
• 10:05 am: Started taking snap on position one (Reference point: -0.10, 0.050). Parameters:0.11A,1.7V,46.8°C
• I took four snap on the same position for compare after on data analyzes. I just wanted one minute break between the snaps. I did the same for every position.
• 10:15 am: Started taking snap on position two (Reference point:-0.10,-0.050 ). Parameters: 0.11A,1.7V,47.1° C
• 10:22 am: Started taking snap on position three (Reference point:0.00 ,0.050). Parameters: 0.11A,1.6V,48.1°C
• 10:26 am: Started taking snap on position four (Reference point: 0.00,-0.050). Parameters:0.11A,1.6V,48 °C
• 10:32 am: Started taking snap on position five (Reference point: 0.05,-0.050). Parameters:0.11A, 1.6V, 48°C
• 10:37 am: Started taking snap on position six (Reference point: 0.05,0.050). Parameters: 0.11A,1.7V,47.6 °C
• We can see in the photos attached below every position also I am working in the analyzes.

[Pamella]

Updates: Problems with the emission intensity and python code.
• Yesterday I was working on get data from FLIR reflector but unfortunately we got some problems:

1. I realized than if I move the reflector a to left or right the screen doesn't get data very well(I attached a photo below). This is a problem because our idea is have the same type of emission every part on screen. Tyler and I worked to tried fix that but don't had success.
2. Dr. Richardson gave me the idea to move the FLIR camera to left or right (The same happens if I move up and down) and keep the refletor on the same position every time but unfortunately we got the same problem, the screen doesn't get data very well(I attached a photo below). Now I am working to tried fix that.

• Also I was able to work on the code to isolate the triangle shape for analyzes, I attached the image for that below.

Today, I was able to make some adjustments to the FLIR camera angle, suggested by Dr. Richardson, and we got small possible movements keeping the same pattern in the shapes of the triangles. I have attached photos below. I was able to move left and right as well as up and down and it worked in four points that I marked on the table.

The only problem is that it only worked on a part of the screen, if I try to place it farther to the right or to the left, we are back to the same problem as yesterday.

• I was able to work on the python code to do analysis on the FLIR-Reflector data.
• I could plot images of total area (Tyler help me on that) with csv file and also could have isolation area for triangles. I have attached examples below. Just for now the images are of different data, so there are some differences in the shapes.
• I'm working on getting a complete analysis code to work with the different positions of the triangles and to be able to do out the statistical analysis.
• Also we keeping have problem to get good data if when we move the camera or the reflector on horizontal or vertical position. I am working a some ideas for that.

Cao suggested using the project without the reflector and mask because in this case we probably got good images around the screen. So I started this yesterday and today I started to get some data to see the stabilization position and check how the parameters fluctuated. I was looking and taking snaps for an hour and a half. I'll repeat this one more time to make sure we have enough data to do analysis.

To do: The next step is to start collecting data by moving the camera FLIR and covering all six positions on the screen (2x3). Also Aiden is on hand to help and is going to make a new 3D print bridge to have good heater support.

I attached a image for the new configuration below and a snap data.

Aiden 3D printed a new bridge for the heater and I installed the new bridge yesterday.

I started collecting data to plot a calibration with the heater. I'm doing measurements with current and the thermocouple (thermometer) to compare with FLIR measurements and have a good calibration.

General information about the lab facility.

1. Changed sticky floor mats, because close to entrance the cleanroom, both sticky floor had a many died ants on top.
2. The light on top of the internet cable bridge is burned out.. I just saw this today but I am not sure if was like this before.
3. The ant bait traps seem very efficient and right now only a few ants are running around in the lab, most are dead in the bait traps, so probably in a day or two we can change those bait traps.

• I collected data to plot a calibration with the heater. I took measurements with current and temperature (the thermocouple - thermometer) to compare with the FLIR measurements.
• I made a plot with this data and we can see how temperature vs current behaves. Note: This data I measured manually.

• Today I tried get data the heater with the black screen but doesn't looks possible have just one "energy" point straight to FLIR camera. Tyler and I tried different current and temperatures but keep very bad data. I attached a snap below.
• I attached a photo about the new setup below. The FLIR is in the most close point possible/safety with the heater. The heater is very close to the black wall but is not touch the screen so is safety.

• I noticed that these measurements have some issues with the weather on different days. We can see in the photo attached below how different the temperatures are on different days, I took the data with the same procedure every day, but we can see the differences between them.
• To Do: I will do a new data collection using FLIR and thermocouple at the same time to plot comparison between both.

• I was able to plot the first graph for a result between the six different positions on the screen, for now we can see the behavior of the heater temperature in a Gaussian graph with combination data between the six files.
• To do: Tyler gave me some ideas today to improve the plot. So I'm going to change the code to have insulation on the values for just the heater ("insulation") and I'm going to plot after this insulation data as well I'm going to get more data and compare with more data for the same position.
• I was using the data than I got last week and I shared on Elog (151) and we can see on this quote

• Today I was able to plot a graph for the isolation point on the center of the heater. I got data from six different positions on the screen (I shifted the all coordinates). I extracted the data for the center point and plot the Gaussian with this extracted data for temperature. I attached the all plots below
• Also I took a snap using the black wall and with the heater at 120.1 C (0.30 A) try to have less noise but we can see this is not very good. At this temperature, we have noise on the top and I don't understand why because the heater is not in this location. I attached a snap below.

• Today I got more data to plot the Gaussian. So I took more snaps in each position for the six different spots than we be using to have a better calibration of the FLIR collected data. I attached the new plot below. Also, I did the same plot for each region as on the Elog 167 but I have more than 20 pics because I was using a big number of data so I just attached one example below.

To access the Elog, click here.

• Also I think we have some real (non-ideal) heat diffusion by the screen and not noise like Dr. Richardson suggested. I was testing today and we can see the first pic before the start heater source turns on, the second pic is at 120.2 C (0.31A) with the heater on and the last pic is after the heater source cooled back down to room temperature. Just in the second pic, we have a strong spot on the top, so it looks like a non-ideal diffusion.

1. I was able to plot the final result with the data to the heater. I attached below the "3Combined_HighTemp_Gaussian_Plot." in this plot we can see better behavior on the Gaussian compared to the plot in ELOG 169, I was using the same data but with a different approach. On the ELOG 169, we have the center point isolated data and this new plot is the temperature more than 70 C isolated because we have a very good heater temperature distinguish do background. For the all data I got I was using a power current of 0.20A. To get the data I waited for 30 minutes until the heater became stable and after that, I started to take snaps, I took more than one snap for each one different 6 positions on the screen, and We can see the positions on ELOG 167.
2. Also I attached the calibration plot ("calibration_plot") between the measurements with the FLIR camera and thermocouple and we can see looks good if we compare the final plot.
3. For better analyses I attached a plot of the calibration line on the Gaussian plot.
4. To do: I will finish the final report.

After meeting and discussing the current state of our work with Prof. Fulda a few weeks ago, we have decided that the best next step for the gtrace project is its integration into finesse work. Our first step towards this integration involved creating a sequential beam trace in contrast to the previous non sequential gtrace simulations. A sequential beam trace not only allows for faster runtimes of the simulation (<1 second) but also allows for more direct reading of certain beam parameters (beam size, gouy phase, and angle of incidence). The sequential model was created alongside a yaml output which provides values of parameters, now including the angle of incidence on a mirror.

Last Monday, Pooyan gave a report to the Cosmic Explorer optical design team on the current state of our project and the ultimate goal of our work. During the same meeting another group working in the optical design team presented their own work with gtrace and optical design, focusing more on optimization of parameters based on desired beam sizes at each mirror. It might be a good idea to begin attempting to bring our individual projects together to allow for collaboration and further developments.

Currently, only the crab1 layout has a sequential trace model. Pooyan is currently working on creating a finesse model for crab1 to serve as a proof of concept for how gtrace could be integrated with finesse by providing useful values such as angles of incidence.

Update Slides

slideshow

On the 5th I had tried to start baking the vacuum chamber however certain parts of the chamber were getting too hot and causing the controllers to shut off. So I turned them off so that the next day I could rearrange the temperature probes. I then on the 6th set them up so that instead of overshooting the temperature they would be a little low in places.

After being left over night the cooler parts of the vacuum chamber got much closer to the desired temperature of 120C.

Here is a table of the temperatures of the sections of the chamber. Note: After these measurements were taken the PID controllers were set to 125C.

Here is a table of temperature of the flanges that have electronics.

Other temperatures of note:

The optical table was about 38C

The cleanroom was around 33C (~91F)

Power point slides

PowerPoint slides new

PowerPoint slides older

slides

[Luke, Luis, Michael]

cleaning cleanroom and particle count

• 8:30 am: started particle count
  • zone 3:
    • 0.3 u: 1195
    • 0.5 u: 177
    • 1.0 u: 132
• zone 4:
  • 0.3 u: 619
  • 0.5 u: 0
  • 1.0 u: 0
• 9:00 am: began surface check and wipedown, including softwalls
• 9:35 am: started vacuuming the floor
• 9:43 am: finished vacuuming the floor
• 9:45 am: started mopping the floor
• 9:55 am: finished mopping the floor
• 9:56 am: started cleaning the buckets
• 10:00 am: started mopping with IPA wipes
• 10:05 am: finished mopping with IPA wipes
• 10:20m: started particle count
  • zone 3:
    • 0.3 u: 2213
    • 0.5 u: 398
    • 1.0 u: 0
• zone 4:
  • 0.3 u: 1150
  • 0.5 u: 177
  • 1.0 u: 44

Chamber temperature: 23C

Chamber Initial Pressure: ~1.8e-8 main, ~3.5e-8 rga

Did another leak test after monday's work to check how the seal was holding up initial leak was 5.5e-9. I then tried to tighten the bolts a bit more the leak rose to 1.9e-8 about a factor of 4 change.

I checked another flange to confirm that I was preforming the test properly. I measured the elbow to pressure sensor to be 2.2e-11 aproximatly what it was earlier in the month (1.9e-11). 

I ran another isolation test. It is still exponetial. Graph attached.

Thoughts:

I belive at this point that it is a knife edge issue when replacing the gasket I checked both flanges and the new gasket. The tp knife edge seemed perfectly fine, the gasket had very minor scratches, and the reducing cross had very small imperfections on its edge. 

We may want to try and use the liquid sealant or get annealed gaskets for 4.5"

[Luke, Luis]

Update of current state of vacuum chamber

Current temp: 24°C

Current pressure: Main 1.77e-8, RGA 5.3e-9 [torr] (Gate valve open)

Summary of recent work-->

To try and reduce the leak in the turbo pump by reducing cross-connection, we replaced the copper gasket. This made no improvement to the leaks.

Initially: 1.9e-9 --->

Left side: 1.33e-9, Right side: 3.37e-9 (Gate valve open)

This is still a significant leak. We have tried to tighten the bolts further, but they are as tight as reasonably possible. 

Things of note: While examining the knife edges, we found some very slight imperfections on the reducing cross's flange as seen in 474. This could be the source of our leak. We have replaced this gasket 1-2 times already and consistently have a slight leak. This imperfection is on the right side of the flange, which would be consistent with the measurements above. 

Unless we want to use the liquid sealant or replace the gasket with an annealed gasket, we could try baking the system again, as this allowed us to reach UHV in the main volume before. It also allowed us to pass the RGA scan, which we are currently failing. (see attached)

[Luke, Luis]

The vacuum chamber is currently baking. 

We stepped up to 125°C by increments of 30°C starting at 60°C. Everything went fine. After about 20 minutes of the PID controllers being set to 125°C, the flange closest to the RGA was 38°C, so we left it connected. 

Current state as of 4:15:

The gate valve is open, and the filament of the RGA is on.

The temperatures are as follows:

PID right barrel upper: 105°C,  RGA volume: 125°C

PID left barrel lower: 125°C, Lid: 82°C

The lower temperatures should climb as the whole system heats up. 

I will come in Saturday afternoon to turn them off so that we can look at the pressures on Monday. 

[Luke, Luis]

We couldn't access the bake log on the wiki. (see attached) So we looked in the documentation provided on the DCC to find at what temperature to bake the Viton O-rings. We found that we should bake Viton at 180°C for 24 hours. 

So we sonic-washed the O-rings, dried them, and then put them in the oven set to the following:

100°C in 15 minutes

100°C for 30 minutes

180°C in 30 minutes

180°C for 24 hours

30°C in 2 hours

Other things of note:

We refilled the water container as it was running out.

The nitrogen used to dry the clean and baked objects is now critically low.

The helium used in leak testing is also quite low (~400 psi).

Regarding the vacuum chamber:

I reattached the pressure gauges to the chamber and gave them about an hour to stabilize. They read out main 8.7e-9, RGA 2.6e-9. Please note these pressures should lower more as we only stopped baking on Saturday afternoon.